style: no longer use backquotes

* README, REFERENCES, TODO, configure.ac, data/README, data/bison.m4,
* data/c++.m4, data/c.m4, data/java.m4, data/lalr1.cc,
* data/lalr1.java, data/yacc.c, doc/local.mk, etc/bench.pl.in,
* src/conflicts.c, src/files.c, src/getargs.c, src/gram.h, src/lalr.c,
* src/location.c, src/location.h, src/muscle-tab.c, src/muscle-tab.h,
* src/output.c, src/parse-gram.c, src/parse-gram.y, src/print-xml.c,
* src/print.c, src/reader.c, src/reduce.c, src/scan-skel.l,
* src/symtab.h, src/system.h, src/tables.c:
Use single quotes, as currently recommended by the GNU Coding Standards.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
2013-02-16 14:07:25 +01:00
parent d49751602c
commit 45eebca42d
34 changed files with 87 additions and 87 deletions

8
TODO
View File

@@ -176,13 +176,13 @@ part of $default. Should we make the two reductions explicit, or just
keep $default? See the following point.
** Disabled Reductions
See `tests/conflicts.at (Defaulted Conflicted Reduction)', and decide
See 'tests/conflicts.at (Defaulted Conflicted Reduction)', and decide
what we want to do.
** Documentation
Extend with error productions. The hard part will probably be finding
the right rule so that a single state does not exhibit too many yet
undocumented ``features''. Maybe an empty action ought to be
undocumented ''features''. Maybe an empty action ought to be
presented too. Shall we try to make a single grammar with all these
features, or should we have several very small grammars?
@@ -243,9 +243,9 @@ into
exp: exp '+' exp | exp '&' exp;
when there are no actions. This can significantly speed up some
grammars. I can't find the papers. In particular the book `LR
grammars. I can't find the papers. In particular the book 'LR
parsing: Theory and Practice' is impossible to find, but according to
`Parsing Techniques: a Practical Guide', it includes information about
'Parsing Techniques: a Practical Guide', it includes information about
this issue. Does anybody have it?