Stop storing rules from 1 to nrules + 1.

* src/LR0.c, src/closure.c, src/derives.c, src/gram.c, src/lalr.c
* src/nullable.c, src/output.c, src/print.c, src/reader.c
* src/reduce.c: Allocate and free from &rules[0], not &rules[1].
Iterate from 0 to nrules.
Use rule_number_as_item_number and item_number_as_rule_number.
Adjust to `derive' now containing possibly 0.
* src/gram.h (rule_number_as_item_number, item_number_as_rule_number):
Handle the `- 1' part in rule numbers from/to item numbers.
* src/conflicts.c (log_resolution): Fix the message which reversed
shift and reduce.
* src/output.c (action_row): Initialize default_rule to -1.
(token_actions): Adjust.
* tests/sets.at (Nullable, Firsts): Fix the previously bogus
expected output.
* tests/conflicts.at (Resolved SR Conflicts): Likewise.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
2002-07-25 21:21:02 +00:00
parent 4a2a22f4c0
commit 4b3d3a8e46
15 changed files with 124 additions and 104 deletions

View File

@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ extern unsigned int nritems;
/* There is weird relationship between OT1H item_number_t and OTOH
symbol_number_t and rule_number_t: we store the latter in
item_number_t. symbol_number_t are stored as are, while
the negation of rule_number_t are stored.
the negation of (rule_number_t + 1) are stored.
Therefore, an symbol_number_t must be a valid item_number_t, and we
sometimes have to perform the converse transformation. */
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ typedef short rule_number_t;
# define RULE_NUMBER_MAX ((rule_number_t) SHRT_MAX)
extern rule_number_t nrules;
# define int_of_rule_number(RNum) ((int) (RNum))
# define rule_number_as_item_number(RNum) ((item_number_t) (- RNum))
# define item_number_as_rule_number(INum) ((rule_number_t) (- INum))
# define rule_number_as_item_number(RNum) ((item_number_t) (- RNum - 1))
# define item_number_as_rule_number(INum) ((rule_number_t) (- INum - 1))
/*--------.