cex: use usual routines for diagnostics about R/R conflicts

This is more consistent, and brings benefits: users know that these
diagnostics are attached to -Wcounterexamples, and they can also click
on the hyperlink if permitted by their terminal.

We go from

    warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
    Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
      Example              A b .
      First derivation     a -> [ A b . ]
      Second derivation    a -> [ A b -> [ b . ] ]

to

    warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
    input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
      Example              A b .
      First derivation     a -> [ A b . ]
      Second derivation    a -> [ A b -> [ b . ] ]

with an hyperlink on -Wcounterexamples.

* src/counterexample.c (counterexample_report_reduce_reduce):
Use complain.
* tests/counterexample.at, tests/diagnostics.at, tests/report.at:
Adjust.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
2020-07-19 18:00:51 +02:00
parent 1438b79e80
commit 9922f1f877
5 changed files with 51 additions and 35 deletions

View File

@@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ State 1
$end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
$default reduce using rule 3 (num)
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
3 num: '0' .
4 id: '0' .
Example '0' .
@@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ State 5
'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)]
$default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
Reduce/reduce conflict on token 'a':
reduce/reduce conflict on token 'a':
8 reported_conflicts: 'a' .
9 reported_conflicts: 'a' .
Example 'a' .
@@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b').
Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
Reduce/reduce conflict on token 'c':
reduce/reduce conflict on token 'c':
12 empty_c2: . %empty
13 empty_c3: . %empty
Example . 'c'

View File

@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ b : A | b;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A b .
First derivation
a
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A b .
First derivation a -> [ A b . ]
Second derivation a -> [ A b -> [ b . ] ]
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ b: D;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens A, C:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on tokens A, C [-Wcounterexamples]
First example D . A $end
First derivation
$accept
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens A, C:
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens A, C:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on tokens A, C [-Wcounterexamples]
First example D . A $end
First derivation $accept -> [ s -> [ a -> [ D . ] A ] $end ]
Second example B D . A $end
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ C : A c A;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 4 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c [-Wcounterexamples]
Example B . b c
First derivation
S
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
`-> A b A
`-> . `-> %empty
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c [-Wcounterexamples]
Example C . c b
First derivation
S
@@ -621,12 +621,12 @@ Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
]],
[[input.y: warning: 4 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c [-Wcounterexamples]
Example B . b c
First derivation S -> [ B -> [ A -> [ B . ] b A -> [ ] ] C -> [ A -> [ ] c A -> [ ] ] ]
Second derivation S -> [ B C -> [ A -> [ B -> [ A -> [ . ] b A -> [ ] ] ] c A -> [ ] ] ]
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c [-Wcounterexamples]
Example C . c b
First derivation S -> [ C -> [ A -> [ C . ] c A -> [ ] ] B -> [ A -> [ ] b A -> [ ] ] ]
Second derivation S -> [ C B -> [ A -> [ C -> [ A -> [ . ] c A -> [ ] ] ] b A -> [ ] ] ]
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ d : a | c A | d;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y: warning: 6 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
First example . c A A $end
First derivation
$accept
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
`-> c d
`-> . `-> c A A
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
time limit exceeded: XXX
First example b . c A A $end
First derivation
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ time limit exceeded: XXX
`-> c A
`-> .
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
time limit exceeded: XXX
First example c . c A A $end
First derivation
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ time limit exceeded: XXX
`-> b d
`-> . `-> c A A
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
First example b c . c A A $end
First derivation
$accept
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
`-> c A
`-> .
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
Example b d .
First derivation
a
@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
`-> b d
`-> d .
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
Example c d .
First derivation
a
@@ -783,20 +783,20 @@ input.y:6.15: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y: warning: 6 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
First example . c A A $end
First derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ b -> [ . ] d -> [ c A A ] ] $end ]
Second example . c A A $end
Second derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ c -> [ . ] d -> [ c A A ] ] $end ]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
time limit exceeded: XXX
First example b . c A A $end
First derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ b d -> [ a -> [ b -> [ . ] d -> [ c A A ] ] ] ] $end ]
Second example b . A $end
Second derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ b d -> [ c -> [ . ] A ] ] $end ]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
time limit exceeded: XXX
First example c . c A A $end
First derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ c d -> [ a -> [ b -> [ . ] d -> [ c A A ] ] ] ] $end ]
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ time limit exceeded: XXX
Second example b c . c A A $end
Reduce derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ b d -> [ a -> [ c d -> [ a -> [ b -> [ . ] d -> [ c A A ] ] ] ] ] ] $end ]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
First example b c . c A A $end
First derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ b d -> [ a -> [ c d -> [ a -> [ b -> [ . ] d -> [ c A A ] ] ] ] ] ] $end ]
Second example b c . A $end
@@ -822,12 +822,12 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
Second example b c . A $end
Reduce derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ b d -> [ a -> [ c d -> [ c -> [ . ] A ] ] ] ] $end ]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
Example b d .
First derivation a -> [ b d . ]
Second derivation a -> [ b d -> [ d . ] ]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
Example c d .
First derivation a -> [ c d . ]
Second derivation a -> [ c d -> [ d . ] ]

View File

@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ input.y:31.4: <warning>warning:</warning> empty rule without %empty [<warning>-W
input.y:31.4: <warning>warning:</warning> empty rule without %empty [<warning>-Wempty-rule</warning>]
31 | e2:
| <warning>^</warning>
| <fixit-insert>%empty</fixit-insert>
| <fixit-insert>%empty</fixit-insert>
input.y: <error>error:</error> reduce/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
input.y: <warning>warning:</warning> reduce/reduce conflict on token "X" [<warning>-Wcounterexamples</warning>]
Example <cex-0><cex-1><cex-2><cex-3><cex-leaf>"X"</cex-leaf> <cex-dot>•</cex-dot></cex-3></cex-2></cex-1><cex-4></cex-4><cex-5><cex-6><cex-7><cex-8><cex-9><cex-10> <cex-leaf>"X"</cex-leaf></cex-10></cex-9></cex-8><cex-11> <cex-leaf>"quuux"</cex-leaf></cex-11></cex-7></cex-6></cex-5><cex-12><cex-13><cex-14> <cex-leaf>"X"</cex-leaf></cex-14></cex-13></cex-12></cex-0>

View File

@@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
↳ exp "⊕" exp
↳ exp "+" exp •
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens $end, "+", "⊕":
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on tokens $end, "+", "⊕" [-Wcounterexamples]
Example exp "+" exp •
First derivation
exp
@@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@ State 7
↳ exp "⊕" exp
↳ exp "+" exp •
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens $end, "+", "⊕":
reduce/reduce conflict on tokens $end, "+", "⊕":
2 exp: exp "+" exp •
3 exp: exp "+" exp •
Example exp "+" exp •