cex: suggest -Wcounterexamples when there are unexpected conflicts

Suggesting -Wcounterexamples when there are conflicts is probably not
what the user wants.  If she knows her conflicts and has set
%expect/%expect-rr appropriately, we shouldn't warn.

The commit also swaps the counterexamples and the report of conflicts,
into, IMHO, a more natural order: from

    Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
    1:    3 a: A .
    1:    8 y: A . B
    Example              A • B C
    First derivation     s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] x ::=[ B C ] ]
    Example              A • B C
    Second derivation    s ::=[ y ::=[ A • B ] c ::=[ C ] ]

    input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
    input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]

to

    input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
    Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
    1:    3 a: A .
    1:    8 y: A . B
    Example              A • B C
    First derivation     s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] x ::=[ B C ] ]
    Example              A • B C
    Second derivation    s ::=[ y ::=[ A • B ] c ::=[ C ] ]

    input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]

* src/conflicts.c (rule_conflicts_print): Rename as...
(report_rule_expectation_mismatches): this.
Move the handling of report_counterexamples to...
(conflicts_print): Here.
Display this warning when applicable.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
2020-06-10 08:11:56 +02:00
parent d2acc4b401
commit b0bb4cde2e
8 changed files with 112 additions and 56 deletions

View File

@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ y: A | A B;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
1: 3 a: A .
1: 8 y: A . B
Example A • B C
@@ -52,7 +53,6 @@ First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] x ::=[ B C ] ]
Example A • B C
Second derivation s ::=[ y ::=[ A • B ] c ::=[ C ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ bc: B bc C | B C;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
1: 7 a: A .
1: 5 b: . B
Example A • B C
@@ -84,7 +85,6 @@ First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] bc ::=[ B C ] ]
Example A • B C
Second derivation s ::=[ ac ::=[ A ac ::=[ b ::=[ • B ] ] C ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:6.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ xby: B | X xby Y;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
1: 4 x: . %empty
1: 9 xby: . B
Example A • B y
@@ -125,7 +126,6 @@ First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ ax ::=[ A x ::=[ X x ::=[ • ] ] ] by
Second example A X • B Y $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A xby ::=[ X xby ::=[ • B ] Y ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:5.4-9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ bc: B C;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token C:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token C:
2: 7 b: B .
2: 9 bc: B . C
First example B • C D $end
@@ -158,7 +159,6 @@ First derivation $accept ::=[ g ::=[ x ::=[ b ::=[ B • ] cd ::=[ C D ] ] ]
Second example B • C $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ g ::=[ x ::=[ bc ::=[ B • C ] ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:6.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ y: A A B;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
1: 5 x: A .
1: 6 y: A . A B
First example A • A $end
@@ -189,7 +190,6 @@ First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ s ::=[ t ::=[ x ::=[ A • ] ] ] t ::=[
Second example A • A B $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ t ::=[ y ::=[ A • A B ] ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ y: Y;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
4: 3 r: b .
4: 7 s: b . A xx y
Example b • A X X Y
@@ -232,7 +233,6 @@ First derivation a ::=[ x ::=[ X • ] t ::=[ X xy ] ]
Second example A X • X
Second derivation a ::=[ t ::=[ A xx ::=[ X • X ] ] ]
input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
input.y:8.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -254,7 +254,8 @@ b : A | b;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
[[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
4: 1 a: A b .
4: 3 b: b .
Example A b •
@@ -262,7 +263,6 @@ First derivation a ::=[ A b • ]
Example A b •
Second derivation a ::=[ A b ::=[ b • ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -284,7 +284,8 @@ b: D;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens A, C:
[[input.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens A, C:
2: 5 a: D .
2: 6 b: D .
First example D • A $end
@@ -292,7 +293,6 @@ First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ D • ] A ] $end ]
Second example B D • A $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ B b ::=[ D • ] A ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -314,7 +314,8 @@ i: X | i J K;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
5: 2 a: H i .
5: 4 i: i . J K
time limit exceeded: XXX
@@ -323,7 +324,6 @@ First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ H i • ] J ] $end ]
Second example H i • J K $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ H i ::=[ i • J K ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:4.4-6: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ b: A B C | A B D;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
4: 7 a: A .
4: 8 b: A . B C
Example N A • B C
@@ -357,7 +358,6 @@ First derivation s ::=[ n ::=[ N a ::=[ A • ] B ] C ]
Example N A • B C
Second derivation s ::=[ n ::=[ N b ::=[ A • B C ] ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -384,7 +384,8 @@ C : A c A;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
[[input.y: warning: 4 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
3: 3 A: B .
3: 5 A: . %empty
Example B • b A A c A
@@ -400,7 +401,6 @@ First derivation S ::=[ C ::=[ A ::=[ C • ] c A ] B ::=[ A b A ] ]
Example C • c A b A
Second derivation S ::=[ C B ::=[ A ::=[ C ::=[ A ::=[ • ] c A ] ] b A ] ]
input.y: warning: 4 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -422,7 +422,9 @@ d : a | c A | d;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y: warning: 6 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
0: 3 b: . %empty
0: 4 c: . %empty
First example • c A A $end
@@ -489,8 +491,6 @@ First derivation a ::=[ c d • ]
Example c d •
Second derivation a ::=[ c d ::=[ d • ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y: warning: 6 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
input.y:6.15: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -516,7 +516,8 @@ i: %empty | i J;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
7: 5 i: i J .
7: 3 a: H i J . J
Example H i J • J J
@@ -524,7 +525,6 @@ First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ H i ::=[ i J • ] J J ] ]
Example H i J • J J
Second derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ H i J • J ] J ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:5.13-15: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
@@ -551,7 +551,8 @@ d: D;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
3: 5 c: . %empty
3: 6 d: . D
Example A a • D
@@ -559,7 +560,6 @@ First derivation s ::=[ A a a ::=[ b ::=[ c ::=[ • ] ] ] d ::=[ D ] ]
Example A a • D
Second derivation s ::=[ A a d ::=[ • D ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -584,7 +584,8 @@ d: D;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
[[Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
3: 5 c: . %empty
3: 6 d: . D
First example A a • D E $end
@@ -592,7 +593,6 @@ First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A a a ::=[ b ::=[ c ::=[ • ] ] ] d ::
Second example A a • D $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A a d ::=[ • D ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
]])
AT_CLEANUP