cex: display all the S/R conflicts, not just one per (state, rule)

Before this commit, on

    %%
    exp
    : "if" exp "then" exp
    | "if" exp "then" exp "else" exp
    | exp "+" exp
    | "num"

we used to not display the third counterexample below:

    Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
      Example              exp "+" exp . "+" exp
      First derivation     exp ::=[ exp ::=[ exp "+" exp . ] "+" exp ]
      Second derivation    exp ::=[ exp "+" exp ::=[ exp . "+" exp ] ]

    Shift/reduce conflict on token "else":
      Example              "if" exp "then" "if" exp "then" exp . "else" exp
      First derivation     exp ::=[ "if" exp "then" exp ::=[ "if" exp "then" exp . ] "else" exp ]
      Second derivation    exp ::=[ "if" exp "then" exp ::=[ "if" exp "then" exp . "else" exp ] ]

    Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
      Example              "if" exp "then" exp . "+" exp
      First derivation     exp ::=[ exp ::=[ "if" exp "then" exp . ] "+" exp ]
      Second derivation    exp ::=[ "if" exp "then" exp ::=[ exp . "+" exp ] ]

    Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
      Example              "if" exp "then" exp "else" exp . "+" exp
      First derivation     exp ::=[ exp ::=[ "if" exp "then" exp "else" exp . ] "+" exp ]
      Second derivation    exp ::=[ "if" exp "then" exp "else" exp ::=[ exp . "+" exp ] ]

* src/counterexample.c (counterexample_report_state): Don't stop of
the first conflicts.
* tests/conflicts.at, tests/counterexample.at, tests/diagnostics.at,
* tests/report.at: Adjust.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
2020-06-16 08:37:28 +02:00
parent 0f120354b6
commit b65bd16e45
6 changed files with 67 additions and 29 deletions

View File

@@ -1279,21 +1279,17 @@ counterexample_report_state (const state *s, FILE *out, const char *prefix)
const reductions *reds = s->reductions;
for (int i = 0; i < reds->num; ++i)
{
rule *r1 = reds->rules[i];
const rule *r1 = reds->rules[i];
const state_item_number c1 = find_state_item_number (r1, sn);
for (int j = state_item_map[sn]; j < state_item_map[sn + 1]; ++j)
{
if (SI_DISABLED (j))
continue;
state_item *si = state_items + j;
item_number conf = *si->item;
if (item_number_is_symbol_number (conf)
if (!SI_DISABLED (j))
{
state_item *si = state_items + j;
item_number conf = *si->item;
if (item_number_is_symbol_number (conf)
&& bitset_test (reds->lookahead_tokens[i], conf))
{
counterexample_report_shift_reduce (c1, j, conf, out, prefix);
break;
}
}
}
for (int j = i+1; j < reds->num; ++j)
{
bitset conf = bitset_create (ntokens, BITSET_FIXED);
@@ -1302,20 +1298,18 @@ counterexample_report_state (const state *s, FILE *out, const char *prefix)
reds->lookahead_tokens[j]);
if (!bitset_empty_p (conf))
{
rule *r2 = reds->rules[j];
for (int k = state_item_map[sn];
k < state_item_map[sn + 1]; ++k)
{
if (SI_DISABLED (k))
continue;
state_item *si = state_items + k;
const rule *r = item_rule (si->item);
if (r == r2)
{
counterexample_report_reduce_reduce (c1, k, conf, out, prefix);
break;
}
}
const rule *r2 = reds->rules[j];
for (int k = state_item_map[sn]; k < state_item_map[sn + 1]; ++k)
if (!SI_DISABLED (k))
{
state_item *si = state_items + k;
const rule *r = item_rule (si->item);
if (r == r2)
{
counterexample_report_reduce_reduce (c1, k, conf, out, prefix);
break;
}
}
}
bitset_free (conf);
}