yysyntax_error: fix for consistent error with lookahead.

* NEWS (2.5): Document.
* data/yacc.c (yysyntax_error): In a verbose syntax error
message while in a consistent state with a default action (which
must be an error action given that yysyntax_error is being
invoked), continue to drop the expected token list, but don't
drop the unexpected token unless there actually is no lookahead.
Moreover, handle that internally instead of returning 1 to tell
the caller to do it.  With that meaning of 1 gone, renumber
return codes more usefully.
(yyparse, yypush_parse): Update yysyntax_error usage.  Most
importantly, set yytoken to YYEMPTY when there's no lookahead.
* data/glr.c (yyreportSyntaxError): As in yacc.c, don't drop the
unexpected token unless there actually is no lookahead.
* data/lalr1.cc (yy::parser::parse): If there's no lookahead,
pass yyempty_ not yyla.type to yysyntax_error_.
(yy::parser::yysyntax_error_): Again, don't drop the unexpected
token unless there actually is no lookahead.
* data/lalr1.java (YYParser::parse): If there's no lookahead,
set yytoken to yyempty_ before invoking yysyntax_error.
(YYParser::yysyntax_error): Again, don't drop the unexpected
token unless there actually is no lookahead.
* tests/conflicts.at (parse.error=verbose and consistent
errors): Extend test group to further reveal how the previous
use of the simple "syntax error" message was too general.  Test
yacc.c, glr.c, lalr1.cc, and lalr1.java.  No longer an expected
failure.
* tests/java.at (AT_JAVA_COMPILE, AT_JAVA_PARSER_CHECK): Move
to...
* tests/local.at: ... here.
(_AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS): Push AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF definition.
(AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS): Pop it.
(AT_FULL_COMPILE): Extend to handle Java.
This commit is contained in:
Joel E. Denny
2010-11-07 16:01:56 -05:00
parent 25a648d8a6
commit d2060f0634
11 changed files with 802 additions and 466 deletions

View File

@@ -627,6 +627,8 @@ m4_popdef([b4_at_dollar])])dnl
if (yyerrstatus_ == 0)
{
++yynerrs_;
if (yychar == yyempty_)
yytoken = yyempty_;
yyerror (]b4_locations_if([yylloc, ])[yysyntax_error (yystate, yytoken));
}
@@ -727,17 +729,52 @@ m4_popdef([b4_at_dollar])])dnl
{]b4_error_verbose_if([[
if (yyErrorVerbose)
{
int yyn = yypact_[yystate];
if (yypact_ninf_ < yyn && yyn <= yylast_)
/* There are many possibilities here to consider:
- Assume YYFAIL is not used. It's too flawed to consider.
See
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2009-12/msg00024.html>
for details. YYERROR is fine as it does not invoke this
function.
- If this state is a consistent state with a default action,
then the only way this function was invoked is if the
default action is an error action. In that case, don't
check for expected tokens because there are none.
- The only way there can be no lookahead present (in tok) is
if this state is a consistent state with a default action.
Thus, detecting the absence of a lookahead is sufficient to
determine that there is no unexpected or expected token to
report. In that case, just report a simple "syntax error".
- Don't assume there isn't a lookahead just because this
state is a consistent state with a default action. There
might have been a previous inconsistent state, consistent
state with a non-default action, or user semantic action
that manipulated yychar. (However, yychar is currently out
of scope during semantic actions.)
- Of course, the expected token list depends on states to
have correct lookahead information, and it depends on the
parser not to perform extra reductions after fetching a
lookahead from the scanner and before detecting a syntax
error. Thus, state merging (from LALR or IELR) and default
reductions corrupt the expected token list. However, the
list is correct for canonical LR with one exception: it
will still contain any token that will not be accepted due
to an error action in a later state.
*/
if (tok != yyempty_)
{
StringBuffer res;
// FIXME: This method of building the message is not compatible
// with internationalization.
StringBuffer res =
new StringBuffer ("syntax error, unexpected ");
res.append (yytnamerr_ (yytname_[tok]));
int yyn = yypact_[yystate];
if (!yy_pact_value_is_default_ (yyn))
{
/* Start YYX at -YYN if negative to avoid negative
indexes in YYCHECK. In other words, skip the first
-YYN actions for this state because they are default
actions. */
int yyxbegin = yyn < 0 ? -yyn : 0;
/* Stay within bounds of both yycheck and yytname. */
int yychecklim = yylast_ - yyn + 1;
int yyxend = yychecklim < yyntokens_ ? yychecklim : yyntokens_;
@@ -746,11 +783,6 @@ m4_popdef([b4_at_dollar])])dnl
if (yycheck_[x + yyn] == x && x != yyterror_
&& !yy_table_value_is_error_ (yytable_[x + yyn]))
++count;
// FIXME: This method of building the message is not compatible
// with internationalization.
res = new StringBuffer ("syntax error, unexpected ");
res.append (yytnamerr_ (yytname_[tok]));
if (count < 5)
{
count = 0;
@@ -762,6 +794,7 @@ m4_popdef([b4_at_dollar])])dnl
res.append (yytnamerr_ (yytname_[x]));
}
}
}
return res.toString ();
}
}