We used to create a short definition of yy::parser with all the
implementations of its member functions outside. But yy::parser is no
longer short and simple to read. Maintaining each function twice is
painful: a lot of redundancy but different indentation levels, output
which depends on whether we are in a header or not (see
d132c2d545), etc.
Let's simplify this and put the implementations into the class
definition itself.
Discussed in this monologue:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2018-12/msg00058.html.
* data/skeletons/c++.m4, data/skeletons/lalr1.cc,
* data/skeletons/variant.hh (b4_basic_symbol_constructor_define)
(_b4_token_constructor_declare, b4_token_constructor_declare)
Merge into...
(b4_basic_symbol_constructor_define, _b4_token_constructor_define)
(b4_token_constructor_define): these.
We used to define such auxiliary structures outside the class, mainly
as a matter of style to keep the definition of yy::parser short and
simple. However, now there's a lot more code generated inside the
class definition (e.g., all the token constructors), so the
readability no longer applies.
However, if we move stack (and slice) inside yy::parser, then it
should no longer be needed to change the namespace to have multiple
parsers: changing the class name should suffice.
One common argument against inner classes is that they code bloat. It
hardly applies here, since typically different parsers will have
different semantic value types, hence different actual stack types.
* data/skeletons/lalr1.cc: Invoke b4_stack_define inside yy::parser.
