From 589616338f4c3195b2df8cd48533030b2a05a07e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rangi <35663410+Rangi42@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:27:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Remove redundant conditional check (#2099)

If `nbBanks > 1` is true, then `sectionTypeInfo[type].firstBank !=
sectionTypeInfo[type].lastBank` must also be true, so checking
whether either is true is unnecessary.

(On the other hand, if `nbBanks == 1`, then we might still have
`sectionTypeInfo[type].firstBank != sectionTypeInfo[type].lastBank`,
since only one of many valid banks for `type` could be in use.)
---
 src/link/output.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/link/output.cpp b/src/link/output.cpp
index 41d9dc7c..66b07133 100644
--- a/src/link/output.cpp
+++ b/src/link/output.cpp
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static void writeMapSummary() {
 		    usedTotal == 1 ? "" : "s",
 		    static_cast<size_t>(nbBanks) * sectionTypeInfo[type].size - usedTotal
 		);
-		if (sectionTypeInfo[type].firstBank != sectionTypeInfo[type].lastBank || nbBanks > 1) {
+		if (sectionTypeInfo[type].firstBank != sectionTypeInfo[type].lastBank) {
 			fprintf(mapFile, " in %u bank%s", nbBanks, nbBanks == 1 ? "" : "s");
 		}
 		putc('\n', mapFile);