Allow defining local labels for another scope (#1159)

fix #1157 for the following source code

```
section "hSAVE_locals",HRAM
func3.hSpam: ds 1  ; no longer produces an error
;.hEggs: ds 1      ; uncomment this to see the new error

section "demo",ROM0
func3:
  ldh a, [.hSpam]
  ret
```

Remove two errors:
- `Not currently in the scope of 'func3'`
- `Local label 'func3.hSpam' in main scope`

Add one error:
- `Relative local label '.hSpam' in main scope`

Co-authored-by: Rangi <35663410+Rangi42@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Damian Yerrick
2023-08-19 20:29:53 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent e634888a50
commit e1f0a13e5a
8 changed files with 16 additions and 45 deletions

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
SECTION "Scopes", ROM0
; Neither of these should be created
.tooSoon
Nice.try
; Tests of injecting local labels into another label's scope.
; This construction is useful to define a subroutine's local variables
; in WRAM or HRAM.
Valid.syntax
Parent:
.loc
@@ -11,8 +12,8 @@ Parent.explicit
dw .explicit ; This should expand to the above
; None of the two locals below should manage to be created, being in the wrong scopes
; Note however that `Parentheses` begins with `Parent`, which string checks may fail to handle
; Note that `Parentheses` begins with `Parent`,
; which string checks may fail to handle
Parentheses.check