6 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Rangi42	e569e0c200	Don't comment "; Next fragment/union" in .map files for empty section pieces ... Fixes #1821	2025-09-05 15:31:46 -04:00
Rangi	d413870e6d	.sym file sorting accounts for local labels' parents' addresses and names (#1684)	2025-05-05 13:57:25 -04:00
Sylvie	5efd303b7f	Allow LOAD FRAGMENT (#1552) ... This was implemented in #736 but removed after discussion in #869. Fixes #1537	2024-10-24 19:45:44 -04:00
ISSOtm	1d01268249	Remove LOAD FRAGMENT ... It's very troublesome, with flaky semantics and a very restricted use space.	2021-05-03 10:51:55 +02:00
Rangi	7e7f92f18c	Assign section locations to all UNIONs/FRAGMENTs ... Fixes the test case from #800 The `out.gb` output was corrected, since the two "test" fragments have a different order in ROM than in SRAM. It is effectively: ; ROM0[$0000], fragments ordered by size jr Label dw Label db 0 ; SRAM[$a000], fragments ordered by .o order ds 1 ; db 0 ds 2 ; jr Label Label: ; $a003 ds 2 ; dw Label	2021-03-28 15:21:17 -04:00
Eldred Habert	7461170956	Add LOAD FRAGMENT pc test (#800) ... Reproduces a reported problem, fix pending	2021-03-28 15:11:20 -04:00