style: use a for loop instead of a while loop, and scope reduction

* src/reader.c (packgram): Improve readability.
The parser calls grammar_current_rule_end at the end of every rhs,
which adds a NULL to separate the rules.  So there is no need to
check whether "p" is non-null before proceeding.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
2013-02-01 17:52:01 +01:00
parent e96415a54b
commit 06505b0c69

View File

@@ -267,9 +267,9 @@ symbol_should_be_used (symbol_list const *s, bool *midrule_warning)
return true;
if ((s->midrule && s->midrule->action_props.is_value_used)
|| (s->midrule_parent_rule
&& symbol_list_n_get (s->midrule_parent_rule,
s->midrule_parent_rhs_index)
->action_props.is_value_used))
&& (symbol_list_n_get (s->midrule_parent_rule,
s->midrule_parent_rhs_index)
->action_props.is_value_used)))
{
*midrule_warning = true;
return true;
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ packgram (void)
{
unsigned int itemno = 0;
rule_number ruleno = 0;
symbol_list *p = grammar;
symbol_list *p;
ritem = xnmalloc (nritems + 1, sizeof *ritem);
@@ -516,9 +516,8 @@ packgram (void)
rules = xnmalloc (nrules, sizeof *rules);
while (p)
for (p = grammar; p; p = p->next)
{
int rule_length = 0;
symbol *ruleprec = p->ruleprec;
record_merge_function_type (p->merger, p->content.sym->type_name,
p->merger_declaration_location);
@@ -541,9 +540,9 @@ packgram (void)
%destructor and %printer apply. */
if (p->midrule_parent_rule
&& (p->action_props.is_value_used
|| symbol_list_n_get (p->midrule_parent_rule,
p->midrule_parent_rhs_index)
->action_props.is_value_used))
|| (symbol_list_n_get (p->midrule_parent_rule,
p->midrule_parent_rhs_index)
->action_props.is_value_used)))
p->content.sym->tag += 1;
/* Don't check the generated rule 0. It has no action, so some rhs
@@ -552,24 +551,27 @@ packgram (void)
if (p != grammar)
grammar_rule_check (p);
for (p = p->next; p && p->content.sym; p = p->next)
{
++rule_length;
{
size_t rule_length = 0;
for (p = p->next; p->content.sym; p = p->next)
{
++rule_length;
/* Don't allow rule_length == INT_MAX, since that might
cause confusion with strtol if INT_MAX == LONG_MAX. */
if (rule_length == INT_MAX)
complain (&rules[ruleno].location, fatal, _("rule is too long"));
/* Don't allow rule_length == INT_MAX, since that might
cause confusion with strtol if INT_MAX == LONG_MAX. */
if (rule_length == INT_MAX)
complain (&rules[ruleno].location, fatal, _("rule is too long"));
/* item_number = symbol_number.
But the former needs to contain more: negative rule numbers. */
ritem[itemno++] =
symbol_number_as_item_number (p->content.sym->number);
/* A rule gets by default the precedence and associativity
of its last token. */
if (p->content.sym->class == token_sym && default_prec)
rules[ruleno].prec = p->content.sym;
}
/* item_number = symbol_number.
But the former needs to contain more: negative rule numbers. */
ritem[itemno++] =
symbol_number_as_item_number (p->content.sym->number);
/* A rule gets by default the precedence and associativity
of its last token. */
if (p->content.sym->class == token_sym && default_prec)
rules[ruleno].prec = p->content.sym;
}
}
/* If this rule has a %prec,
the specified symbol's precedence replaces the default. */
@@ -583,9 +585,6 @@ packgram (void)
aver (itemno < ITEM_NUMBER_MAX);
++ruleno;
aver (ruleno < RULE_NUMBER_MAX);
if (p)
p = p->next;
}
aver (itemno == nritems);