cex: fixes, and enable tests

* src/counterexample.c, src/derivation.c:
Do not output diagnostics on stdout, that's the job of stderr, and the
testsuite heavily depend on this.
Do not leave trailing spaces in the output.
* tests/counterexample.at: Use AT_KEYWORDS.
Specify the expected outputs.
* tests/local.mk: Add counterexample.at.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
2020-05-13 18:38:09 +02:00
parent 6279945003
commit 93c849ef0d
4 changed files with 253 additions and 72 deletions

View File

@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
#include <hash.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <gl_linked_list.h>
#include <gl_xlist.h>
#include <gl_rbtreehash_list.h>
#include "closure.h"
@@ -82,21 +81,22 @@ new_counterexample (const derivation *d1, const derivation *d2,
void
print_counterexample (counterexample *cex)
{
FILE *out = stderr;
if (cex->unifying)
printf ("Example ");
fprintf (out, "Example ");
else
printf ("First Example");
derivation_print_leaves (cex->d1, stdout);
printf ("\nFirst derivation ");
derivation_print (cex->d1, stdout);
fprintf (out, "First Example ");
derivation_print_leaves (cex->d1, out);
fprintf (out, "\nFirst derivation ");
derivation_print (cex->d1, out);
if (!cex->unifying)
{
printf ("\nSecond Example ");
derivation_print_leaves (cex->d2, stdout);
fprintf (out, "\nSecond Example ");
derivation_print_leaves (cex->d2, out);
}
printf ("\nSecond derivation ");
derivation_print (cex->d2, stdout);
fputs ("\n\n", stdout);
fprintf (out, "\nSecond derivation ");
derivation_print (cex->d2, out);
fputs ("\n\n", out);
}
/*
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ expand_to_conflict (state_item_number start, symbol_number conflict_sym)
gl_list_t queue = gl_list_create (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL,
(gl_listelement_dispose_fn) si_bfs_free,
true, 1, (const void **) &init);
si_bfs_node *node;
si_bfs_node *node = NULL;
// breadth-first search for a path of productions to the conflict symbol
while (gl_list_size (queue) > 0)
{
@@ -463,11 +463,11 @@ nonunifying_shift_path (gl_list_t reduce_path, state_item *shift_conflict)
}
if (trace_flag & trace_cex)
{
puts ("SHIFT ITEM PATH:");
fputs ("SHIFT ITEM PATH:\n", stderr);
gl_list_iterator_t it = gl_list_iterator (result);
state_item *sip;
while (gl_list_iterator_next (&it, (const void **) &sip, NULL))
print_state_item (sip, stdout);
print_state_item (sip, stderr);
}
return result;
}
@@ -562,11 +562,11 @@ search_state_free (search_state *ss)
static void
search_state_print (search_state *ss)
{
fputs ("CONFLICT 1 ", stdout);
fputs ("CONFLICT 1 ", stderr);
print_parse_state (ss->states[0]);
fputs ("CONFLICT 2 ", stdout);
fputs ("CONFLICT 2 ", stderr);
print_parse_state (ss->states[1]);
putc ('\n', stdout);
putc ('\n', stderr);
}
/*
@@ -1071,13 +1071,14 @@ unifying_example (state_item_number itm1,
if (!assurance_printed && time_passed > ASSURANCE_LIMIT
&& stage3result)
{
puts
("Productions leading up to the conflict state found. Still finding a possible unifying counterexample...");
fputs ("Productions leading up to the conflict state found. "
"Still finding a possible unifying counterexample...",
stderr);
assurance_printed = true;
}
if (time_passed > TIME_LIMIT)
{
printf ("time limit exceeded: %f\n", time_passed);
fprintf (stderr, "time limit exceeded: %f\n", time_passed);
goto cex_search_end;
}
}
@@ -1171,10 +1172,11 @@ void
counterexample_report_shift_reduce (state_item_number itm1, state_item_number itm2,
symbol_number next_sym)
{
puts ("Shift-Reduce Conflict:");
print_state_item (&state_items[itm1], stdout);
print_state_item (&state_items[itm2], stdout);
printf ("On Symbol: %s\n", symbols[next_sym]->tag);
FILE *out = stderr;
fputs ("Shift-Reduce Conflict:\n", out);
print_state_item (&state_items[itm1], out);
print_state_item (&state_items[itm2], out);
fprintf (out, "On Symbol: %s\n", symbols[next_sym]->tag);
counterexample_report (itm1, itm2, next_sym, true);
}
@@ -1182,16 +1184,15 @@ void
counterexample_report_reduce_reduce (state_item_number itm1, state_item_number itm2,
bitset conflict_syms)
{
puts ("Reduce-Reduce Conflict:");
print_state_item (&state_items[itm1], stdout);
print_state_item (&state_items[itm2], stdout);
fputs ("On Symbols: {", stdout);
FILE *out = stderr;
fputs ("Reduce-Reduce Conflict:\n", out);
print_state_item (&state_items[itm1], out);
print_state_item (&state_items[itm2], out);
fputs ("On Symbols: {", out);
bitset_iterator biter;
state_item_number sym;
BITSET_FOR_EACH (biter, conflict_syms, sym, 0)
{
printf ("%s,", symbols[sym]->tag);
}
fputs ("}\n", stdout);
fprintf (out, "%s,", symbols[sym]->tag);
fputs ("}\n", out);
counterexample_report (itm1, itm2, bitset_first (conflict_syms), false);
}

View File

@@ -18,9 +18,11 @@
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
#include <config.h>
#include "derivation.h"
#include "system.h"
#include "derivation.h"
static derivation d_dot = { -1, NULL };
const derivation *
@@ -68,21 +70,24 @@ derivation_print (const derivation *deriv, FILE *f)
{
if (deriv == &d_dot)
{
fputs (" ", f);
fputs ("", f);
return;
}
symbol *sym = symbols[deriv->sym];
if (!deriv->children)
{
fprintf (f, " %s ", sym->tag);
fprintf (f, " %s", sym->tag);
return;
}
gl_list_iterator_t it = gl_list_iterator (deriv->children);
derivation *child;
fprintf (f, " %s ::=[", sym->tag);
while (gl_list_iterator_next (&it, (const void **) &child, NULL))
derivation_print (child, f);
fputs ("] ", f);
{
derivation_print (child, f);
fputs (" ", f);
}
fputs ("]", f);
}
void
@@ -90,18 +95,23 @@ derivation_print_leaves (const derivation *deriv, FILE *f)
{
if (deriv == &d_dot)
{
fputs ("", f);
fputs ("", f);
return;
}
if (!deriv->children)
{
symbol *sym = symbols[deriv->sym];
fprintf (f, " %s ", sym->tag);
fprintf (f, "%s", sym->tag);
return;
}
gl_list_iterator_t it = gl_list_iterator (deriv->children);
const char *sep = "";
derivation *child;
while (gl_list_iterator_next (&it, (const void **) &child, NULL))
derivation_print_leaves (child, f);
{
fputs (sep, f);
sep = " ";
derivation_print_leaves (child, f);
}
}

View File

@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ AT_BANNER([[Counterexamples.]])
## --------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Unifying S/R])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token A B C
@@ -33,8 +34,17 @@ x: B | B C;
y: A | A B;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
1: 3 a: A .
1: 8 y: A . B
On Symbol: B
Example A • B C
First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] x ::=[ B C ] ]
Second derivation s ::=[ y ::=[ A • B ] c ::=[ C ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -44,6 +54,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## ------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Deep Unifying S/R])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token A B C
@@ -55,8 +66,17 @@ a: A | A a;
bc: B bc C | B C;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
1: 7 a: A .
1: 5 b: . B
On Symbol: B
Example A • B C
First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] bc ::=[ B C ] ]
Second derivation s ::=[ ac ::=[ A ac ::=[ b ::=[ • B ] ] C ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:6.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -66,6 +86,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## ------------------------------------ ##
AT_SETUP([S/R Conflict with Nullable Symbols])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token A B X Y
@@ -78,8 +99,26 @@ y: %empty | Y y;
xby: B | X xby Y;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
1: 4 x: . %empty
1: 9 xby: . B
On Symbol: B
Example A • B y
First derivation s ::=[ ax ::=[ A x ::=[ • ] ] by ::=[ B y ] ]
Second derivation s ::=[ A xby ::=[ • B ] ]
Shift-Reduce Conflict:
5: 4 x: . %empty
5: 9 xby: . B
On Symbol: B
First Example A X • B y $end
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ ax ::=[ A x ::=[ X x ::=[ • ] ] ] by ::=[ B y ] ] $end ]
Second Example A X • B Y $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A xby ::=[ X xby ::=[ • B ] Y ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:5.4-9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -89,6 +128,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## ---------------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Non-unifying Ambiguous S/R])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token A B C D E
@@ -101,8 +141,18 @@ cd: C D;
bc: B C;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
2: 7 b: B .
2: 9 bc: B . C
On Symbol: C
First Example B • C D $end
First derivation $accept ::=[ g ::=[ x ::=[ b ::=[ B • ] cd ::=[ C D ] ] ] $end ]
Second Example B • C $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ g ::=[ x ::=[ bc ::=[ B • C ] ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:6.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -112,6 +162,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## ------------------------------ ##
AT_SETUP([Non-unifying Unambiguous S/R])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token A B
@@ -122,8 +173,17 @@ x: A;
y: A A B;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
1: 5 x: A .
1: 6 y: A . A B
On Symbol: A
First Example A • A $end
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ s ::=[ t ::=[ x ::=[ A • ] ] ] t ::=[ x ::=[ A ] ] ] $end ]
Second Example A • A B $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ t ::=[ y ::=[ A • A B ] ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -133,6 +193,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## ----------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([S/R after first token])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token A B X Y
@@ -148,8 +209,27 @@ xy: X Y;
y: Y;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
4: 3 r: b .
4: 7 s: b . A xx y
On Symbol: A
Example b • A X X Y
First derivation a ::=[ r ::=[ b • ] t ::=[ A x ::=[ X ] xy ::=[ X Y ] ] ]
Second derivation a ::=[ s ::=[ b • xx ::=[ A X X ] y ::=[ Y ] ] ]
Shift-Reduce Conflict:
10: 8 x: X .
10: 9 xx: X . X
On Symbol: X
First Example X • X
First derivation t ::=[ x ::=[ X • ] X ]
Second Example A X • X
Second derivation a ::=[ t ::=[ A xx ::=[ X • X ] ] ]
input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
input.y:8.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -159,6 +239,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## ----------------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Unifying R/R counterexample])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token A
@@ -167,8 +248,17 @@ a : A b ;
b : A | b;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Reduce-Reduce Conflict:
4: 1 a: A b .
4: 3 b: b .
On Symbols: {$end,}
Example A b •
First derivation a ::=[ A b • ]
Second derivation a ::=[ A b ::=[ b • ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -178,6 +268,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## ------------------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Non-unifying R/R lr1 conflict])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token A B C D
@@ -187,8 +278,18 @@ a: D;
b: D;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Reduce-Reduce Conflict:
2: 5 a: D .
2: 6 b: D .
On Symbols: {A,C,}
First Example D • A $end
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ D • ] A ] $end ]
Second Example B D • A $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ B b ::=[ D • ] A ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -198,6 +299,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## ------------------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Non-unifying R/R lr2 conflict])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token H J K X
@@ -207,8 +309,19 @@ a: H i;
i: X | i J K;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
5: 2 a: H i .
5: 4 i: i . J K
On Symbol: J
time limit exceeded: 6.000000
First Example H i • J $end
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ H i • ] J ] $end ]
Second Example H i • J K $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ H i ::=[ i • J K ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:4.4-6: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -221,6 +334,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
# graph search
AT_SETUP([Cex Search Prepend])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token N A B C D
@@ -231,8 +345,17 @@ a: A;
b: A B C | A B D;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
4: 7 a: A .
4: 8 b: A . B C
On Symbol: B
Example N A • B C
First derivation s ::=[ n ::=[ N a ::=[ A • ] B ] C ]
Second derivation s ::=[ n ::=[ N b ::=[ A • B C ] ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -245,6 +368,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
# precedence/associativity directives work.
AT_SETUP([R/R cex with prec])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%left b
@@ -256,8 +380,24 @@ B : A b A;
C : A c A;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Reduce-Reduce Conflict:
3: 3 A: B .
3: 5 A: . %empty
On Symbols: {b,c,}
Example B • b A A c A
First derivation S ::=[ B ::=[ A ::=[ B • ] b A ] C ::=[ A c A ] ]
Second derivation S ::=[ B C ::=[ A ::=[ B ::=[ A ::=[ • ] b A ] ] c A ] ]
Reduce-Reduce Conflict:
4: 4 A: C .
4: 5 A: . %empty
On Symbols: {b,c,}
Example C • c A A b A
First derivation S ::=[ C ::=[ A ::=[ C • ] c A ] B ::=[ A b A ] ]
Second derivation S ::=[ C B ::=[ A ::=[ C ::=[ A ::=[ • ] c A ] ] b A ] ]
input.y: warning: 4 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -267,6 +407,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## ------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Null nonterminals])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token A
@@ -277,9 +418,8 @@ c : ;
d : a | c A | d;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -288,6 +428,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
## --------------------------- ##
AT_SETUP([Non-unifying Prefix Share])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
# Tests for a counterexample which should start its derivation
# at a shared symbol rather than the start symbol.
@@ -300,8 +441,17 @@ a: H i J J
i: %empty | i J;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
7: 5 i: i J .
7: 3 a: H i J . J
On Symbol: J
Example H i J • J J
First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ H i ::=[ i J • ] J J ] ]
Second derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ H i J • J ] J ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y:5.13-15: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -314,6 +464,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
# are derived correctly.
AT_SETUP([Deep Null Unifying])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token a d
@@ -325,8 +476,16 @@ C: %empty
D: d;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
3: 5 C: . %empty
3: 6 D: . d
On Symbol: d
Example a A • d
First derivation S ::=[ a A A ::=[ B ::=[ C ::=[ • ] ] ] D ::=[ d ] ]
Second derivation S ::=[ a A D ::=[ • d ] ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -338,6 +497,7 @@ AT_CLEANUP
# Tests that expand_to_conflict works with nullable sybols
AT_SETUP([Deep Null Non-unifying])
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
[[%token a d e
@@ -349,8 +509,17 @@ C: %empty
D: d;
]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], 0, [],
[[
AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wcounterexample input.y], [], [],
[[Shift-Reduce Conflict:
3: 5 C: . %empty
3: 6 D: . d
On Symbol: d
First Example a A • d e $end
First derivation $accept ::=[ S ::=[ a A A ::=[ B ::=[ C ::=[ • ] ] ] D ::=[ d ] e ] $end ]
Second Example a A • d $end
Second derivation $accept ::=[ S ::=[ a A D ::=[ • d ] ] $end ]
input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
AT_CLEANUP

View File

@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ TESTSUITE_AT = \
%D%/c++.at \
%D%/calc.at \
%D%/conflicts.at \
%D%/counterexample.at \
%D%/cxx-type.at \
%D%/diagnostics.at \
%D%/existing.at \