cex: also include in the report on --report=counterexamples

And let --report=all include the counterexamples.

* src/getargs.h, src/getargs.c (report_cex): New.
* src/main.c: Compute counterexamples when -rcex is specified.
* src/print.c: Include the counterexamples when -rcex is specified.

* tests/conflicts.at, tests/existing.at, tests/local.at: Adjust.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
2020-06-14 08:18:37 +02:00
parent d4f854e5b2
commit c35e829a76
8 changed files with 71 additions and 16 deletions

3
TODO
View File

@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ could try to use the same color for the same rule.
Show the counterexamples. This is going to be really hard and/or painful.
Unless we play it dumb (little structure).
*** Doc
-Wcounterexamples, --report=counterexamples
** glr.cc
Get rid of global_tokens_and_yystype.

View File

@@ -206,23 +206,26 @@ ARGMATCH_DEFINE_GROUP (report, enum report)
static const argmatch_report_doc argmatch_report_docs[] =
{
{ "states", N_("describe the states") },
{ "itemsets", N_("complete the core item sets with their closure") },
{ "lookaheads", N_("explicitly associate lookahead tokens to items") },
{ "solved", N_("describe shift/reduce conflicts solving") },
{ "all", N_("include all the above information") },
{ "none", N_("disable the report") },
{ "states", N_("describe the states") },
{ "itemsets", N_("complete the core item sets with their closure") },
{ "lookaheads", N_("explicitly associate lookahead tokens to items") },
{ "solved", N_("describe shift/reduce conflicts solving") },
{ "counterexamples", N_("generate conflict counterexamples") },
{ "all", N_("include all the above information") },
{ "none", N_("disable the report") },
{ NULL, NULL },
};
static const argmatch_report_arg argmatch_report_args[] =
{
{ "none", report_none },
{ "states", report_states },
{ "itemsets", report_states | report_itemsets },
{ "lookaheads", report_states | report_lookahead_tokens },
{ "solved", report_states | report_solved_conflicts },
{ "all", report_all },
{ "none", report_none },
{ "states", report_states },
{ "itemsets", report_states | report_itemsets },
{ "lookaheads", report_states | report_lookahead_tokens },
{ "solved", report_states | report_solved_conflicts },
{ "counterexamples", report_cex },
{ "cex", report_cex },
{ "all", report_all },
{ NULL, report_none },
};

View File

@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ enum report
report_itemsets = 1 << 1,
report_lookahead_tokens = 1 << 2,
report_solved_conflicts = 1 << 3,
report_cex = 1 << 4,
report_all = ~0
};
/** What appears in the *.output file. */

View File

@@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[])
conflicts_update_state_numbers (old_to_new, nstates_old);
free (old_to_new);
}
if (warning_is_enabled (Wcounterexamples))
if (report_flag & report_cex
|| warning_is_enabled (Wcounterexamples))
counterexample_init ();
conflicts_print ();
timevar_pop (tv_conflicts);

View File

@@ -356,7 +356,9 @@ print_state (FILE *out, const state *s)
fputc ('\n', out);
fputs (s->solved_conflicts, out);
}
if (warning_is_enabled (Wcounterexamples) && has_conflicts (s))
if (has_conflicts (s)
&& (report_flag & report_cex
|| warning_is_enabled (Wcounterexamples)))
{
fputc ('\n', out);
counterexample_report_state (s, out, " ");

View File

@@ -860,6 +860,15 @@ State 5
OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
$default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
Shift/reduce conflict on token OP:
1 exp: exp OP exp .
1 exp: exp . OP exp
Example exp OP exp • OP exp
First derivation exp ::=[ exp ::=[ exp OP exp • ] OP exp ]
Example exp OP exp • OP exp
Second derivation exp ::=[ exp OP exp ::=[ exp • OP exp ] ]
]])
AT_CLEANUP
@@ -1195,6 +1204,15 @@ State 1
$end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
$default reduce using rule 3 (num)
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
3 num: '0' .
4 id: '0' .
Example '0' •
First derivation exp ::=[ num ::=[ '0' • ] ]
Example '0' •
Second derivation exp ::=[ id ::=[ '0' • ] ]
State 2
@@ -1734,6 +1752,15 @@ State 4
reported_conflicts go to state 6
Shift/reduce conflict on token 'a':
10 reported_conflicts: . %empty
8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
First example resolved_conflict • 'a'
First derivation start ::=[ resolved_conflict reported_conflicts ::=[ • ] 'a' ]
Second example resolved_conflict • 'a' 'a'
Second derivation start ::=[ resolved_conflict reported_conflicts ::=[ • 'a' ] 'a' ]
State 5
@@ -1744,6 +1771,15 @@ State 5
'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)]
$default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
Reduce/reduce conflict on token 'a':
8 reported_conflicts: 'a' .
9 reported_conflicts: 'a' .
Example 'a' •
First derivation reported_conflicts ::=[ 'a' • ]
Example 'a' •
Second derivation reported_conflicts ::=[ 'a' • ]
State 6
@@ -1920,6 +1956,15 @@ AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b').
Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
Reduce/reduce conflict on token 'c':
12 empty_c2: . %empty
13 empty_c3: . %empty
Example • 'c'
First derivation start ::=[ empty_c2 ::=[ • ] 'c' ]
Example • 'c'
Second derivation start ::=[ empty_c3 ::=[ • ] 'c' ]
State 1
]])

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ dnl support is rapidly evolving, let's keep that information to be careful.
dnl However, we don't do diffs for canonical LR(1) because the diff is huge.
m4_pushdef([AT_LALR1_DIFF_CHECK],
[AT_CHECK([[sed 's/^%define lr.type .*$//' input.y > input-lalr.y]])
AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input-lalr.y]], [[0]], [ignore], [ignore])
AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all,no-cex input-lalr.y]], [[0]], [ignore], [ignore])
AT_DIFF_U_CHECK([[input-lalr.output input.output]], [$1])])
AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([$2[: LALR(1)]], [[LALR]], [[last-state]],

View File

@@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ yylex (void)
m4_if(m4_index(m4_quote($3), [no-xml]), -1,
[AT_BISON_CHECK],
[AT_BISON_CHECK_NO_XML])([[-Wall --report=all --defines -o input.c input.y]],
[AT_BISON_CHECK_NO_XML])([[-Wall --report=all,no-cex --defines -o input.c input.y]],
[0], [], m4_dquote($7))
m4_if(m4_index(m4_quote($3), [last-state]), -1,