mirror of
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/bison.git
synced 2026-03-09 04:13:03 +00:00
cex: don't assume the terminal supports "•"
Use of print_unicode_char suggested by Bruno Haible. https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gettext/2020-06/msg00012.html * src/gram.h (print_dot_fallback, print_dot): New. * src/gram.c, src/derivation.c: Use it. * tests/counterexample.at, tests/report.at: Adjust the test suite. * .travis.yml, README-hacking.md: Adjust.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ fi
|
||||
: ${PERL='@PERL@'}
|
||||
|
||||
# Use simple quotes (lib/quote.c).
|
||||
# We have an LC_ALL=C pushed onto us via maint.mk.
|
||||
LC_CTYPE=C
|
||||
export LC_CTYPE
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -864,10 +864,10 @@ State 5
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token OP:
|
||||
1 exp: exp OP exp .
|
||||
1 exp: exp . OP exp
|
||||
Example exp OP exp • OP exp
|
||||
First derivation exp ::=[ exp ::=[ exp OP exp • ] OP exp ]
|
||||
Example exp OP exp • OP exp
|
||||
Second derivation exp ::=[ exp OP exp ::=[ exp • OP exp ] ]
|
||||
Example exp OP exp . OP exp
|
||||
First derivation exp ::=[ exp ::=[ exp OP exp . ] OP exp ]
|
||||
Example exp OP exp . OP exp
|
||||
Second derivation exp ::=[ exp OP exp ::=[ exp . OP exp ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
]])
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1207,10 +1207,10 @@ State 1
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
|
||||
3 num: '0' .
|
||||
4 id: '0' .
|
||||
Example '0' •
|
||||
First derivation exp ::=[ num ::=[ '0' • ] ]
|
||||
Example '0' •
|
||||
Second derivation exp ::=[ id ::=[ '0' • ] ]
|
||||
Example '0' .
|
||||
First derivation exp ::=[ num ::=[ '0' . ] ]
|
||||
Example '0' .
|
||||
Second derivation exp ::=[ id ::=[ '0' . ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1755,10 +1755,10 @@ State 4
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token 'a':
|
||||
10 reported_conflicts: . %empty
|
||||
8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
|
||||
First example resolved_conflict • 'a'
|
||||
First derivation start ::=[ resolved_conflict reported_conflicts ::=[ • ] 'a' ]
|
||||
Second example resolved_conflict • 'a' 'a'
|
||||
Second derivation start ::=[ resolved_conflict reported_conflicts ::=[ • 'a' ] 'a' ]
|
||||
First example resolved_conflict . 'a'
|
||||
First derivation start ::=[ resolved_conflict reported_conflicts ::=[ . ] 'a' ]
|
||||
Second example resolved_conflict . 'a' 'a'
|
||||
Second derivation start ::=[ resolved_conflict reported_conflicts ::=[ . 'a' ] 'a' ]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1774,10 +1774,10 @@ State 5
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token 'a':
|
||||
8 reported_conflicts: 'a' .
|
||||
9 reported_conflicts: 'a' .
|
||||
Example 'a' •
|
||||
First derivation reported_conflicts ::=[ 'a' • ]
|
||||
Example 'a' •
|
||||
Second derivation reported_conflicts ::=[ 'a' • ]
|
||||
Example 'a' .
|
||||
First derivation reported_conflicts ::=[ 'a' . ]
|
||||
Example 'a' .
|
||||
Second derivation reported_conflicts ::=[ 'a' . ]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1959,10 +1959,10 @@ AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token 'c':
|
||||
12 empty_c2: . %empty
|
||||
13 empty_c3: . %empty
|
||||
Example • 'c'
|
||||
First derivation start ::=[ empty_c2 ::=[ • ] 'c' ]
|
||||
Example • 'c'
|
||||
Second derivation start ::=[ empty_c3 ::=[ • ] 'c' ]
|
||||
Example . 'c'
|
||||
First derivation start ::=[ empty_c2 ::=[ . ] 'c' ]
|
||||
Example . 'c'
|
||||
Second derivation start ::=[ empty_c3 ::=[ . ] 'c' ]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ y: A | A B;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
|
||||
Example A • B C
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] x ::=[ B C ] ]
|
||||
Example A • B C
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ y ::=[ A • B ] c ::=[ C ] ]
|
||||
Example A . B C
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ A . ] x ::=[ B C ] ]
|
||||
Example A . B C
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ y ::=[ A . B ] c ::=[ C ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
]])
|
||||
@@ -76,10 +76,10 @@ bc: B bc C | B C;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
|
||||
Example A • B C
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ A • ] bc ::=[ B C ] ]
|
||||
Example A • B C
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ ac ::=[ A ac ::=[ b ::=[ • B ] ] C ] ]
|
||||
Example A . B C
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ A . ] bc ::=[ B C ] ]
|
||||
Example A . B C
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ ac ::=[ A ac ::=[ b ::=[ . B ] ] C ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:6.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
]])
|
||||
@@ -107,16 +107,16 @@ xby: B | X xby Y;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
|
||||
Example A • B y
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ ax ::=[ A x ::=[ • ] ] by ::=[ B y ] ]
|
||||
Example A • B
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ A xby ::=[ • B ] ]
|
||||
Example A . B y
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ ax ::=[ A x ::=[ . ] ] by ::=[ B y ] ]
|
||||
Example A . B
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ A xby ::=[ . B ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
|
||||
First example A X • B y $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ ax ::=[ A x ::=[ X x ::=[ • ] ] ] by ::=[ B y ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example A X • B Y $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A xby ::=[ X xby ::=[ • B ] Y ] ] $end ]
|
||||
First example A X . B y $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ ax ::=[ A x ::=[ X x ::=[ . ] ] ] by ::=[ B y ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example A X . B Y $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A xby ::=[ X xby ::=[ . B ] Y ] ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:5.4-9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
]])
|
||||
@@ -144,10 +144,10 @@ bc: B C;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token C:
|
||||
First example B • C D $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ g ::=[ x ::=[ b ::=[ B • ] cd ::=[ C D ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example B • C $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ g ::=[ x ::=[ bc ::=[ B • C ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
First example B . C D $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ g ::=[ x ::=[ b ::=[ B . ] cd ::=[ C D ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example B . C $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ g ::=[ x ::=[ bc ::=[ B . C ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:6.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
]])
|
||||
@@ -173,10 +173,10 @@ y: A A B;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
|
||||
First example A • A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ s ::=[ t ::=[ x ::=[ A • ] ] ] t ::=[ x ::=[ A ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example A • A B $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ t ::=[ y ::=[ A • A B ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
First example A . A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ s ::=[ t ::=[ x ::=[ A . ] ] ] t ::=[ x ::=[ A ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example A . A B $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ t ::=[ y ::=[ A . A B ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
]])
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -206,16 +206,16 @@ y: Y;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
|
||||
Example b • A X X Y
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ r ::=[ b • ] t ::=[ A x ::=[ X ] xy ::=[ X Y ] ] ]
|
||||
Example b • A X X Y
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ s ::=[ b • xx ::=[ A X X ] y ::=[ Y ] ] ]
|
||||
Example b . A X X Y
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ r ::=[ b . ] t ::=[ A x ::=[ X ] xy ::=[ X Y ] ] ]
|
||||
Example b . A X X Y
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ s ::=[ b . xx ::=[ A X X ] y ::=[ Y ] ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token X:
|
||||
First example X • X xy
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ x ::=[ X • ] t ::=[ X xy ] ]
|
||||
Second example A X • X
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ t ::=[ A xx ::=[ X • X ] ] ]
|
||||
First example X . X xy
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ x ::=[ X . ] t ::=[ X xy ] ]
|
||||
Second example A X . X
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ t ::=[ A xx ::=[ X . X ] ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
input.y:8.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
@@ -240,21 +240,21 @@ b : A | b;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
|
||||
Example A b •
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ A b • ]
|
||||
Example A b •
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ A b ::=[ b • ] ]
|
||||
Example A b .
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ A b . ]
|
||||
Example A b .
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ A b ::=[ b . ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
]])
|
||||
|
||||
AT_CLEANUP
|
||||
|
||||
## ------------------------------- ##
|
||||
## Non-unifying R/R lr1 conflict. ##
|
||||
## ------------------------------- ##
|
||||
## --------------------------------- ##
|
||||
## Non-unifying R/R LR(1) conflict. ##
|
||||
## --------------------------------- ##
|
||||
|
||||
AT_SETUP([Non-unifying R/R lr1 conflict])
|
||||
AT_SETUP([Non-unifying R/R LR(1) conflict])
|
||||
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
|
||||
|
||||
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
|
||||
@@ -268,21 +268,21 @@ b: D;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens A, C:
|
||||
First example D • A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ D • ] A ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example B D • A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ B b ::=[ D • ] A ] $end ]
|
||||
First example D . A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ D . ] A ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example B D . A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ B b ::=[ D . ] A ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
]])
|
||||
|
||||
AT_CLEANUP
|
||||
|
||||
## ------------------------------- ##
|
||||
## Non-unifying R/R lr2 conflict. ##
|
||||
## ------------------------------- ##
|
||||
## --------------------------------- ##
|
||||
## Non-unifying R/R LR(2) conflict. ##
|
||||
## --------------------------------- ##
|
||||
|
||||
AT_SETUP([Non-unifying R/R lr2 conflict])
|
||||
AT_SETUP([Non-unifying R/R LR(2) conflict])
|
||||
AT_KEYWORDS([cex])
|
||||
|
||||
AT_DATA([[input.y]],
|
||||
@@ -297,10 +297,10 @@ AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
|
||||
time limit exceeded: XXX
|
||||
First example H i • J $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ H i • ] J ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example H i • J K $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ H i ::=[ i • J K ] ] $end ]
|
||||
First example H i . J $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ a ::=[ H i . ] J ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example H i . J K $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ H i ::=[ i . J K ] ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:4.4-6: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
]])
|
||||
@@ -329,10 +329,10 @@ b: A B C | A B D;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
|
||||
Example N A • B C
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ n ::=[ N a ::=[ A • ] B ] C ]
|
||||
Example N A • B C
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ n ::=[ N b ::=[ A • B C ] ] ]
|
||||
Example N A . B C
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ n ::=[ N a ::=[ A . ] B ] C ]
|
||||
Example N A . B C
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ n ::=[ N b ::=[ A . B C ] ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
]])
|
||||
@@ -362,16 +362,16 @@ C : A c A;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 4 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
|
||||
Example B • b A A c A
|
||||
First derivation S ::=[ B ::=[ A ::=[ B • ] b A ] C ::=[ A c A ] ]
|
||||
Example B • b A c A
|
||||
Second derivation S ::=[ B C ::=[ A ::=[ B ::=[ A ::=[ • ] b A ] ] c A ] ]
|
||||
Example B . b A A c A
|
||||
First derivation S ::=[ B ::=[ A ::=[ B . ] b A ] C ::=[ A c A ] ]
|
||||
Example B . b A c A
|
||||
Second derivation S ::=[ B C ::=[ A ::=[ B ::=[ A ::=[ . ] b A ] ] c A ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens b, c:
|
||||
Example C • c A A b A
|
||||
First derivation S ::=[ C ::=[ A ::=[ C • ] c A ] B ::=[ A b A ] ]
|
||||
Example C • c A b A
|
||||
Second derivation S ::=[ C B ::=[ A ::=[ C ::=[ A ::=[ • ] c A ] ] b A ] ]
|
||||
Example C . c A A b A
|
||||
First derivation S ::=[ C ::=[ A ::=[ C . ] c A ] B ::=[ A b A ] ]
|
||||
Example C . c A b A
|
||||
Second derivation S ::=[ C B ::=[ A ::=[ C ::=[ A ::=[ . ] c A ] ] b A ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
]])
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -397,55 +397,55 @@ AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
input.y: warning: 6 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
|
||||
First example • c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example • c A A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ c ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] $end ]
|
||||
First example . c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ . ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example . c A A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ c ::=[ . ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
|
||||
time limit exceeded: XXX
|
||||
First example b • c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example b • A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ c ::=[ • ] A ] ] $end ]
|
||||
First example b . c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ . ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example b . A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ c ::=[ . ] A ] ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
|
||||
time limit exceeded: XXX
|
||||
First example c • c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example c • A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ c ::=[ • ] A ] ] $end ]
|
||||
First example c . c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ . ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example c . A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ c ::=[ . ] A ] ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
|
||||
time limit exceeded: XXX
|
||||
First example b c • c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example b c • A
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ b d ::=[ c • A ] ]
|
||||
First example b c . c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ . ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example b c . A
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ b d ::=[ c . A ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token A:
|
||||
First example b c • c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ • ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example b c • A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ c ::=[ • ] A ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
First example b c . c A A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ a ::=[ b ::=[ . ] d ::=[ c A A ] ] ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example b c . A $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ c ::=[ . ] A ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
|
||||
First example b c • A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ c ::=[ • ] A ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example b c • A
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ b d ::=[ c • A ] ]
|
||||
First example b c . A $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ a ::=[ b d ::=[ a ::=[ c d ::=[ c ::=[ . ] A ] ] ] ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example b c . A
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ b d ::=[ c . A ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
|
||||
Example b d •
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ b d • ]
|
||||
Example b d •
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ b d ::=[ d • ] ]
|
||||
Example b d .
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ b d . ]
|
||||
Example b d .
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ b d ::=[ d . ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
|
||||
Example c d •
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ c d • ]
|
||||
Example c d •
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ c d ::=[ d • ] ]
|
||||
Example c d .
|
||||
First derivation a ::=[ c d . ]
|
||||
Example c d .
|
||||
Second derivation a ::=[ c d ::=[ d . ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
input.y:6.15: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
@@ -474,10 +474,10 @@ i: %empty | i J;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
|
||||
Example H i J • J J
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ H i ::=[ i J • ] J J ] ]
|
||||
Example H i J • J J
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ H i J • J ] J ]
|
||||
Example H i J . J J
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ H i ::=[ i J . ] J J ] ]
|
||||
Example H i J . J J
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ a ::=[ H i J . J ] J ]
|
||||
|
||||
input.y:5.13-15: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
|
||||
]])
|
||||
@@ -507,10 +507,10 @@ d: D;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
|
||||
Example A a • D
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ A a a ::=[ b ::=[ c ::=[ • ] ] ] d ::=[ D ] ]
|
||||
Example A a • D
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ A a d ::=[ • D ] ]
|
||||
Example A a . D
|
||||
First derivation s ::=[ A a a ::=[ b ::=[ c ::=[ . ] ] ] d ::=[ D ] ]
|
||||
Example A a . D
|
||||
Second derivation s ::=[ A a d ::=[ . D ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
]])
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -538,10 +538,10 @@ d: D;
|
||||
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX([input.y], [], [],
|
||||
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
|
||||
First example A a • D E $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A a a ::=[ b ::=[ c ::=[ • ] ] ] d ::=[ D ] E ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example A a • D $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A a d ::=[ • D ] ] $end ]
|
||||
First example A a . D E $end
|
||||
First derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A a a ::=[ b ::=[ c ::=[ . ] ] ] d ::=[ D ] E ] $end ]
|
||||
Second example A a . D $end
|
||||
Second derivation $accept ::=[ s ::=[ A a d ::=[ . D ] ] $end ]
|
||||
|
||||
]])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1240,12 +1240,12 @@ Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
|
||||
|
||||
State 0
|
||||
|
||||
0 $accept: . exp $end
|
||||
1 exp: . exp "⊕" exp
|
||||
2 | . exp "+" exp
|
||||
3 | . exp "+" exp
|
||||
4 | . "number"
|
||||
5 | . "Ñùṃéℝô"
|
||||
0 $accept: • exp $end
|
||||
1 exp: • exp "⊕" exp
|
||||
2 | • exp "+" exp
|
||||
3 | • exp "+" exp
|
||||
4 | • "number"
|
||||
5 | • "Ñùṃéℝô"
|
||||
|
||||
"number" shift, and go to state 1
|
||||
"Ñùṃéℝô" shift, and go to state 2
|
||||
@@ -1255,24 +1255,24 @@ State 0
|
||||
|
||||
State 1
|
||||
|
||||
4 exp: "number" .
|
||||
4 exp: "number" •
|
||||
|
||||
$default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
State 2
|
||||
|
||||
5 exp: "Ñùṃéℝô" .
|
||||
5 exp: "Ñùṃéℝô" •
|
||||
|
||||
$default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
State 3
|
||||
|
||||
0 $accept: exp . $end
|
||||
1 exp: exp . "⊕" exp
|
||||
2 | exp . "+" exp
|
||||
3 | exp . "+" exp
|
||||
0 $accept: exp • $end
|
||||
1 exp: exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
2 | exp • "+" exp
|
||||
3 | exp • "+" exp
|
||||
|
||||
$end shift, and go to state 4
|
||||
"+" shift, and go to state 5
|
||||
@@ -1281,20 +1281,20 @@ State 3
|
||||
|
||||
State 4
|
||||
|
||||
0 $accept: exp $end .
|
||||
0 $accept: exp $end •
|
||||
|
||||
$default accept
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
State 5
|
||||
|
||||
1 exp: . exp "⊕" exp
|
||||
2 | . exp "+" exp
|
||||
2 | exp "+" . exp
|
||||
3 | . exp "+" exp
|
||||
3 | exp "+" . exp
|
||||
4 | . "number"
|
||||
5 | . "Ñùṃéℝô"
|
||||
1 exp: • exp "⊕" exp
|
||||
2 | • exp "+" exp
|
||||
2 | exp "+" • exp
|
||||
3 | • exp "+" exp
|
||||
3 | exp "+" • exp
|
||||
4 | • "number"
|
||||
5 | • "Ñùṃéℝô"
|
||||
|
||||
"number" shift, and go to state 1
|
||||
"Ñùṃéℝô" shift, and go to state 2
|
||||
@@ -1304,12 +1304,12 @@ State 5
|
||||
|
||||
State 6
|
||||
|
||||
1 exp: . exp "⊕" exp
|
||||
1 | exp "⊕" . exp
|
||||
2 | . exp "+" exp
|
||||
3 | . exp "+" exp
|
||||
4 | . "number"
|
||||
5 | . "Ñùṃéℝô"
|
||||
1 exp: • exp "⊕" exp
|
||||
1 | exp "⊕" • exp
|
||||
2 | • exp "+" exp
|
||||
3 | • exp "+" exp
|
||||
4 | • "number"
|
||||
5 | • "Ñùṃéℝô"
|
||||
|
||||
"number" shift, and go to state 1
|
||||
"Ñùṃéℝô" shift, and go to state 2
|
||||
@@ -1319,11 +1319,11 @@ State 6
|
||||
|
||||
State 7
|
||||
|
||||
1 exp: exp . "⊕" exp
|
||||
2 | exp . "+" exp
|
||||
2 | exp "+" exp . [$end, "+", "⊕"]
|
||||
3 | exp . "+" exp
|
||||
3 | exp "+" exp . [$end, "+", "⊕"]
|
||||
1 exp: exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
2 | exp • "+" exp
|
||||
2 | exp "+" exp • [$end, "+", "⊕"]
|
||||
3 | exp • "+" exp
|
||||
3 | exp "+" exp • [$end, "+", "⊕"]
|
||||
|
||||
"⊕" shift, and go to state 6
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1338,24 +1338,24 @@ State 7
|
||||
Conflict between rule 2 and token "+" resolved as reduce (%left "+").
|
||||
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
|
||||
2 exp: exp "+" exp .
|
||||
1 exp: exp . "⊕" exp
|
||||
2 exp: exp "+" exp •
|
||||
1 exp: exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
First derivation exp ::=[ exp ::=[ exp "+" exp • ] "⊕" exp ]
|
||||
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
Second derivation exp ::=[ exp "+" exp ::=[ exp • "⊕" exp ] ]
|
||||
|
||||
Reduce/reduce conflict on tokens $end, "+", "⊕":
|
||||
2 exp: exp "+" exp .
|
||||
3 exp: exp "+" exp .
|
||||
2 exp: exp "+" exp •
|
||||
3 exp: exp "+" exp •
|
||||
Example exp "+" exp •
|
||||
First derivation exp ::=[ exp "+" exp • ]
|
||||
Example exp "+" exp •
|
||||
Second derivation exp ::=[ exp "+" exp • ]
|
||||
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
|
||||
3 exp: exp "+" exp .
|
||||
1 exp: exp . "⊕" exp
|
||||
3 exp: exp "+" exp •
|
||||
1 exp: exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
First derivation exp ::=[ exp ::=[ exp "+" exp • ] "⊕" exp ]
|
||||
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
@@ -1365,10 +1365,10 @@ State 7
|
||||
|
||||
State 8
|
||||
|
||||
1 exp: exp . "⊕" exp
|
||||
1 | exp "⊕" exp . [$end, "+", "⊕"]
|
||||
2 | exp . "+" exp
|
||||
3 | exp . "+" exp
|
||||
1 exp: exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
1 | exp "⊕" exp • [$end, "+", "⊕"]
|
||||
2 | exp • "+" exp
|
||||
3 | exp • "+" exp
|
||||
|
||||
"+" shift, and go to state 5
|
||||
"⊕" shift, and go to state 6
|
||||
@@ -1378,8 +1378,8 @@ State 8
|
||||
$default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
|
||||
|
||||
Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
|
||||
1 exp: exp "⊕" exp .
|
||||
1 exp: exp . "⊕" exp
|
||||
1 exp: exp "⊕" exp •
|
||||
1 exp: exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
Example exp "⊕" exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
First derivation exp ::=[ exp ::=[ exp "⊕" exp • ] "⊕" exp ]
|
||||
Example exp "⊕" exp • "⊕" exp
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user