This example will soon use GNU readline, so its scanner should be easy
to use (concurrently) on strings, not streams. This is not a place
where Flex shines, and anyway, these are examples of Bison, not Flex.
There's already lexcalc and reccalc that demonstrate the use of Flex.
* examples/c/bistromathic/scan.l: Remove.
* examples/c/bistromathic/parse.y (yylex): New.
Adjust dependencies.
The bistromathic example should not use Flex, it makes it too complex.
But it was the only example to show location tracking with Flex.
* examples/c/lexcalc/lexcalc.test, examples/c/lexcalc/parse.y,
* examples/c/lexcalc/scan.l: Demonstrate location tracking as is done
in bistromathic.
The current implementation of parser::context keeps a copy of the
lookahead. This is troublesome since we support move-only types.
Besides, while GCC is happy with the current implementation, Clang
complains that the ctor it needs to build the copy of the lookahead is
not yet available.
461. calc.at:1120: testing Calculator C++ %defines %locations parse.error=verbose %name-prefix "calc" %verbose ...
calc.at:1120: COLUMNS=1000; export COLUMNS; bison --color=no -fno-caret -Wno-deprecated -o calc.cc calc.y
calc.at:1120: $CXX $CXXFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS -o calc calc.cc calc-lex.cc calc-main.cc $LIBS
stderr:
In file included from calc-lex.cc:7:
calc.hh:351:12: error: instantiation of function 'calc::parser::basic_symbol<calc::parser::by_type>::basic_symbol' required here, but no definition is available [-Werror,-Wundefined-func-template]
struct symbol_type : basic_symbol<by_type>
^
calc.hh:273:7: note: forward declaration of template entity is here
basic_symbol (const basic_symbol& that);
^
calc.hh:351:12: note: add an explicit instantiation declaration to suppress this warning if 'calc::parser::basic_symbol<calc::parser::by_type>::basic_symbol' is explicitly instantiated in another translation unit
struct symbol_type : basic_symbol<by_type>
^
1 error generated.
In file included from calc-main.cc:7:
calc.hh:351:12: error: instantiation of function 'calc::parser::basic_symbol<calc::parser::by_type>::basic_symbol' required here, but no definition is available [-Werror,-Wundefined-func-template]
struct symbol_type : basic_symbol<by_type>
^
calc.hh:273:7: note: forward declaration of template entity is here
basic_symbol (const basic_symbol& that);
^
calc.hh:351:12: note: add an explicit instantiation declaration to suppress this warning if 'calc::parser::basic_symbol<calc::parser::by_type>::basic_symbol' is explicitly instantiated in another translation unit
struct symbol_type : basic_symbol<by_type>
^
1 error generated.
stdout:
calc.at:1120: exit code was 1, expected 0
461. calc.at:1120: 461. Calculator C++ %defines %locations parse.error=verbose %name-prefix "calc" %verbose (calc.at:1120): FAILED (calc.at:1120)
* data/skeletons/lalr1.cc (context::yyla_): Make it a const-ref.
Move the implementation out of the declaration.
Address compiler warnings such as
warning: declaration of 'yyla' shadows a member of 'yy::parser::context' [-Wshadow]
* data/skeletons/lalr1.cc (context): Don't use the same names for
variables and members.
Use foo_ for private members, as in parser.
Also, use the + trick in array accesses to please ICC and provide it
with an int.
* data/skeletons/lalr1.cc: added support here
* tests/calc.at: added test cases
* tests/local.at: added yyreport_syntax_error implementation
for C++ test cases
Prefer b4_parse_error_case over the adhoc solution
`m4_case + b4_percent_define_get`. Same for b4_parse_error_bmatch.
* data/skeletons/glr.c: here
* data/skeletons/yacc.c: here
* etc/bench.pl.in: Adjust to the current use of %define's values.
Don't use %error-verbose.
Prefer Bison to CPP (e.g., api.value.type).
Avoid returning characters directly, so that %define api.token.raw works.
* doc/bison.texi (Parser Internationalization): Move most of its
content into...
(Enabling I18n): this new node.
(Token I18n): New.
(Token Decl): Refer to token internationalization.
(Error Reporting Function): Promote parse.error detailed.
Since Bison 2.7, output was indented four spaces for explanatory
statements. For example:
input.y:2.7-13: error: %type redeclaration for exp
input.y:1.7-11: previous declaration
Since the introduction of caret-diagnostics, it became less clear.
Remove the indentation and display submessages as in GCC:
input.y:2.7-13: error: %type redeclaration for exp
2 | %type <float> exp
| ^~~~~~~
input.y:1.7-11: note: previous declaration
1 | %type <int> exp
| ^~~~~
* src/complain.h (SUB_INDENT): Remove.
(warnings): Add "note" to the enum.
* src/complain.h, src/complain.c (complain_indent): Replace by...
(subcomplain): this.
Adjust all dependencies.
* tests/actions.at, tests/diagnostics.at, tests/glr-regression.at,
* tests/input.at, tests/named-refs.at, tests/regression.at:
Adjust expectations.
bison 3.5.2
* tag 'v3.5.2':
version 3.5.2
news: 3.5.2
gnulib: update
doc: update Doxygen template
java: avoid trailing white spaces
m4: fix b4_token_format
doc: clearly state that %yacc only makes sense with yacc.c
doc: spell check
examples: be more robust to spaces in paths
larlr1.cc: Reject unsupported values for parse.lac
We used to emit:
/** Token number,to be returned by the scanner. */
static final int NUM = 258;
/** Token number,to be returned by the scanner. */
static final int NEG = 259;
with no space after the comma. Fix that.
* data/skeletons/bison.m4 (b4_token_format): Quote where appropriate.
This revealed a number of things I had not realized:
- the Java location tracking was aliasing the same pair of positions
for all the symbols (see previous commit).
- in impure parsers, it's quite easy to use incorrect locations for
diagnostics, since yyerror uses yylloc, which is the location of the
lookahead, not that of the current lhs. So we need something like
{
YYLTYPE old_yylloc = yylloc;
yylloc = @$;
yyerror (]AT_PARAM_IF([result, count, nerrs, ])[buf);
yylloc = old_yylloc;
}
Maybe we should do that little yylloc dance in the skeleton instead
of leaving it to the user? It might be costly... But that's only
for users of the impure parsers, which are asking for trouble
anyway.
- in glr.cc invoking yyerror is somewhat cumbersome: the C++ interface
is not available as we are in yyparse (which in C), and yyerror is
used by glr.cc itself to bind it to the user's parser::error. If we
call yyerror, we need:
yyerror (]AT_LOCATION_IF([[&@$, ]])[yyparser, ]AT_PARAM_IF([result, count, nerrs, ])[msg);
However calling yy::parser::error is easier, once we know that the
current parser object is available as 'yyparser'. Which also saves
us from having to pass the parse-params ourselves:
yyparser.error (]AT_LOCATION_IF([[@$, ]])[msg);
* tests/calc.at: Invoke yyerror by hand, instead of using fprintf etc.
Adjust expectations.
* data/skeletons/lalr1.java (Context): Make data members private.
(Context.getLocation): New.
* examples/java/calc/Calc.y, tests/java.at, tests/local.at: Adjust.
* doc/bison.texi (Tokens from Literals): Move to code using
%token-table to...
(Decl Summary: %token-table): here.
* data/skeletons/bison.m4: Implement mutual exclusion.
* tests/input.at: Check it.
* doc/local.mk: Be robust to the removal of doc/.
With texinfo.tex 2019-09-24.13, node names with + are not properly
handled.
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-texinfo/2020-02/msg00004.html
* doc/bison.texi: Always use the three-argument form for references to
node with a + in the name.
This reverts commit ebab1ffca8.
This commit removed "useless" initializers, going from
/* YYPACT[STATE-NUM] -- Index in YYTABLE of the portion describing
STATE-NUM. */
private static final byte yypact_[] = yypact_init ();
private static final byte[] yypact_init ()
{
return new byte[]
{
25, -7, -8, 37, -8, 40, -8, 20, -8, 61,
-8, -8, 3, 9, 51, -8, -8, -2, -2, -2,
-2, -2, -2, -8, -8, -8, 1, 66, 66, 3,
3, 3
};
}
to
/* YYPACT[STATE-NUM] -- Index in YYTABLE of the portion describing
STATE-NUM. */
private static final byte[] yypact_ =
{
25, -7, -8, 37, -8, 40, -8, 20, -8, 61,
-8, -8, 3, 9, 51, -8, -8, -2, -2, -2,
-2, -2, -2, -8, -8, -8, 1, 66, 66, 3,
3, 3
};
But it turns out that this was on purpose, to work around the 64KB
limitation in JVM methods. It was introduced on the 2008-11-10 by
Di-an Jan in 09ccae9b18: "Work around
Java's ``code too large'' problem for parser tables". See
https://lists.gnu.org/r/help-bison/2008-11/msg00004.html. A real
test, where we would hit the JVM limitation, would be nice.
To avoid further regressions, add comments.
