We crash if the input contains a string containing a NUL byte.
Reported by Suhwan Song.
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-bison/2020-07/msg00051.html
* src/flex-scanner.h (STRING_FREE): Avoid accidental use of
last_string.
* src/scan-gram.l: Don't call STRING_FREE without calling
STRING_FINISH first.
* tests/input.at (Invalid inputs): Check that case.
The original Texinfo macros introducing colors were made for
diagnostics, which are printed in bold. So by copy-paste accident the
styles we introduced for counterexamples were also in bold. They
should not.
* doc/bison.texi: Separate the styling of diagnostics from the styling
for counterexamples.
Don't use bold in the latter case.
With have a clash with the "max" function.
src/counterexample.c: In function 'visited_hasher':
src/counterexample.c:720:48: error: declaration of 'max' shadows a global declaration [-Werror=shadow]
src/counterexample.c:116:12: error: shadowed declaration is here [-Werror=shadow]
* src/counterexample.c (visited_hasher): Alpha conversion.
Fix 6b78e50cef, "cex: make "rerun with
'-Wcex'" a note instead of a warning"
* tests/conflicts.at (-W versus %expect and %expect-rr): Fix
expectations.
Unfortunately I found no way to use the ↳ glyph in Texinfo, so I used
@arrow{} instead, which has a different width, so we have to have all
the examples doubled, once for TeX, another for the rest of the world.
* doc/bison.texi: Use the current display in the examples.
* doc/calc.y, doc/ids.y, doc/if-then-else.y, doc/sequence.y: New.
Currently the suggestion to rerun is a -Wother warning:
warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
warning: rerun with option '-Wcounterexamples' to generate conflict counterexamples [-Wother]
Instead, let's attach it as a subnote of the diagnostic (in the
current case, -Wconflicts-sr):
warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
note: rerun with option '-Wcounterexamples' to generate conflict counterexamples
* src/conflicts.c (conflicts_print): Do that.
Adjust the test suite.
From
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
Example: A b .
First derivation
a
`-> A b .
Second derivation
a
`-> A b
`-> b .
to
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
Example: A b .
First reduce derivation
a
`-> A b .
Second reduce derivation
a
`-> A b
`-> b .
* src/counterexample.c (print_counterexample): here.
Compute the width of the labels to properly align the values.
* tests/conflicts.at, tests/counterexample.at, tests/diagnostics.at,
* tests/report.at: Adjust.
Now that the derivation is no longer printed on one line, aligning the
example and the derivation is no longer useful. It can actually be
harmful, as it makes the overall structure less clear.
* src/derivation.h, src/derivation.c (derivation_print_leaves): Remove
the `prefix` argument.
* src/counterexample.c (print_counterexample): Put the example next to
its label.
* tests/conflicts.at, tests/counterexample.at, tests/diagnostics.at,
* tests/report.at: Adjust.
Now that we use complain, the "sections" are clearer.
* src/counterexample.c (print_counterexample): Use the empty line only
in reports.
* tests/counterexample.at, tests/diagnostics.at, tests/report.at: Adjust.
This is more consistent, and brings benefits: users know that these
diagnostics are attached to -Wcounterexamples, and they can also click
on the hyperlink if permitted by their terminal.
We go from
warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
Reduce/reduce conflict on token $end:
Example A b .
First derivation a -> [ A b . ]
Second derivation a -> [ A b -> [ b . ] ]
to
warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token $end [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A b .
First derivation a -> [ A b . ]
Second derivation a -> [ A b -> [ b . ] ]
with an hyperlink on -Wcounterexamples.
* src/counterexample.c (counterexample_report_reduce_reduce):
Use complain.
* tests/counterexample.at, tests/diagnostics.at, tests/report.at:
Adjust.
* src/complain.c (begin_hyperlink, end_hyperlink): New.
(warnings_print_categories): Use them.
* tests/local.at (AT_SET_ENV): Disable hyperlinks in the tests, they
contain random id's, and brackets (which is not so nice for M4).
Unfortunately Texinfo somewhat mangles anchors such as `-Werror` into
`g_t_002dWerror`, so let's not include the dash.
* doc/bison.texi (Diagnostics): here.
The code was written on top of buffers of `char[26]`, and then was
changed to use `char *`, yet was still using `sizeof buf`, which
became `sizeof (char *)` instead of `sizeof (char[26])`.
Reported by Dagobert Michelsen.
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-bison/2020-07/msg00023.html
* src/glyphs.h, src/glyphs.c: Get rid of uses of `char *`, use only
glyph_buffer_t.
Sometimes, understanding the derivations is difficult, because they
are serialized to fit in one line. For instance, the example taken
from the NEWS file:
%token ID
%%
s: a ID
a: expr
expr: expr ID ',' | "expr"
gave
First example expr • ID ',' ID $end
Shift derivation $accept → [ s → [ a → [ expr → [ expr • ID ',' ] ] ID ] $end ]
Second example expr • ID $end
Reduce derivation $accept → [ s → [ a → [ expr • ] ID ] $end ]
Printing as trees, it gives:
First example expr • ID ',' ID $end
Shift derivation
$accept
↳ s $end
↳ a ID
↳ expr
↳ expr • ID ','
Second example expr • ID $end
Reduce derivation
$accept
↳ s $end
↳ a ID
↳ expr •
* src/glyphs.h, src/glyphs.c (down_arrow, empty, derivation_separator):
New.
* src/derivation.c (derivation_print, derivation_print_impl): Rename
as...
(derivation_print_flat, derivation_print_flat_impl): These.
(fputs_if, derivation_depth, derivation_width, derivation_print_tree)
(derivation_print_tree_impl, derivation_print): New.
* src/counterexample.c (print_counterexample): Adjust.
* tests/conflicts.at, tests/counterexample.at, tests/diagnostics.at,
* tests/report.at: Adjust.
When reporting counterexamples for s/r conflicts, put the shift first.
This is more natural, and displays the default resolution first, which
is also what happens for r/r conflicts where the smallest rule number
is displayed first, and "wins".
* src/counterexample.c (counterexample): Add a shift_reduce member.
(new_counterexample): Adjust.
Swap the derivations when this is a s/r conflict.
(print_counterexample): For s/r conflicts, prefer "Shift derivation"
and "Reduce derivation" rather than "First/Second derivation".
* tests/conflicts.at, tests/counterexample.at, tests/report.at: Adjust.
* NEWS, doc/bison.texi: Ditto.
Currently we use both names. Let's stick to the short one.
* src/AnnotationList.c, src/conflicts.c, src/counterexample.c,
* src/getargs.c, src/getargs.h, src/graphviz.c, src/ielr.c,
* src/lalr.c, src/print-graph.c, src/print-xml.c, src/print.c,
* src/state-item.c, src/state.c, src/state.h, src/tables.c:
s/lookahead_token/lookahead/gi.
* src/counterexample.c, src/parse-simulation.c: It is more usual in
Bison to use sizeof on expressions than on types, especially for
allocation.
Let the compiler do it's job instead of calling memcpy ourselves.
There are too many gl_list_t in there, it's hard to understand what is
going on. Introduce and use more precise types. I sure can be wrong
in some places, it's hard to tell without proper tool support.
* src/counterexample.c, src/lssi.c, src/lssi.h, src/parse-simulation.c,
* src/parse-simulation.h, src/state-item.c, src/state-item.h
(si_bfs_node_list, search_state_list, ssb_list, lssi_list)
(state_item_list): New.
