Akim Demaille d3ae5af6ec yacc: beware of "uninitialized uses" warnings ...

Again some issues with the fact that yylval is reported by GCC as
possibly not initialized in some cases.  Here, the case at hand is the
%destructor.

I am still not convinced that it is worth going all the trouble of
using pragmas to disable temporarily some warnings, instead of just
initializing the looking symbol once for all, but that's what Paul
voted for, see
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2012-10/msg00050.html>.

* data/c.m4 (b4_attribute_define): Define
YY_IGNORE_MAYBE_UNINITIALIZED_BEGIN, YY_IGNORE_MAYBE_UNINITIALIZED_END,
YY_INITIAL_VALUE here, as we will need them in the generation of the
destructor function, which is defined in yacc.c before yyparse, which
was in charge of defining these macros.
* data/yacc.c (b4_declare_scanner_communication_variables): Simplify:
trying to factor the definitions of the case pure and impure is
too complex.
Actually, it is not even clear that this macro should really exist,
as even the calls are complex.
Be careful not to issue a lone ";", as this is a statement, and C90
forbids declarations after statements ; so write
"YY_INITIAL_VALUE(Decl;)", not "YY_INITIAL_VALUE(Decl);".

2013-07-25 17:53:59 +02:00

62 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw