This line:
slice<stack_symbol_type, stack_type> slice (yystack_, yylen);
triggers warnings:
parse.h:1790:11: note: shadowed declaration is here
Reported by Frank Heckenbach.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bison/2019-01/msg00002.html
* configure.ac (warn_c): Move -Wshadow to...
(warn_common): here.
* data/skeletons/stack.hh (slice): Define as an inner class of stack.
* data/skeletons/lalr1.cc: Adjust.
Rename the variable as 'range' instead of 'slice'.
There are many macros that are defined and used just
once (b4_public_if, b4_abstract_if, etc.). That's overkill. Rather,
let's define a macro to build the "public class YYParser" line.
It appears that the same syntax with "extends", "abstract", etc. is
implemented in the D parser, which looks very fishy...
* data/skeletons/d.m4, data/skeletons/java.m4 (b4_public_if)
(b4_abstract_if, b4_final_if, b4_strictfp_if): Replace with
(b4_parser_class_declaration): this.
* data/skeletons/lalr1.d, data/skeletons/lalr1.java: Adjust.
Commit 90a8537e62 was right, but issued
two error messages. Commit 80ef7e7639
tried to address that by mapping yychar and yytoken to empty, but that
completely breaks the invariants of glr.c. In particular, yygetToken
can be called repeatedly and is expected to return the latest result,
unless yytoken is YYEMPTY. Since the previous attempt was "recording"
that the token was coming from an exception by setting it to YYEMPTY,
instead of getting again the faulty token, we fetched another one.
Rather, revert to the first approach: map yytoken to "invalid token",
but record in yychar the fact that we come from an exception thrown in
the scanner.
* data/skeletons/glr.c (YYFAULTYTOK): New.
(yygetToken): Use it to record syntax errors from the scanner.
* tests/c++.at (Syntax error as exception): In addition to checking
syntax_error with error recovery, make sure it also behaves as
expected without.
The previous name was historical and inconsistent.
* src/muscle-tab.c (define_directive): Use the proper value passing
syntax, based on the muscle kind.
(muscle_percent_variable_update): Use the right value passing syntax.
Migrate from parser_class_name to api.parser.class.
* data/skeletons: Migrate from parser_class_name to api.parser.class.
* doc/bison.texi (%define Summary): Document both parser_class_name
and api.parser.class.
Promote the latter over the former.
This is very debatable. This function is not pure at all, so it could
stick to returning void: that's a common coding style to tell the
difference between "real" (pure) functions and side-effecting
subroutines. However, we already have this style elsewhere (e.g.,
yylex), and I feel the callers are somewhat nice to read this way.
* data/skeletons/glr.c (yygetLRActions): Return the action rather than
passing by pointer.
While at it, fix type of yytoken.
Adjust callers.
Reported by Askar Safin.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2019-01/msg00000.html
* data/skeletons/glr.c (yygetToken): Return YYEMPTY when an exception
is thrown.
* data/skeletons/lalr1.cc: Log when an exception is caught.
* tests/c++.at (Syntax error as exception): Be sure to recover from
error before triggering another error.
This way, it is easier to make sure its implementation is available in
glr.cc too, which is not the case currently.
* data/skeletons/c++.m4 (b4_public_types_define): Move the
implementation of syntax_error...
(b4_public_types_declare): here.
We used to create a short definition of yy::parser with all the
implementations of its member functions outside. But yy::parser is no
longer short and simple to read. Maintaining each function twice is
painful: a lot of redundancy but different indentation levels, output
which depends on whether we are in a header or not (see
d132c2d545), etc.
Let's simplify this and put the implementations into the class
definition itself.
Discussed in this monologue:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2018-12/msg00058.html.
* data/skeletons/c++.m4, data/skeletons/lalr1.cc,
* data/skeletons/variant.hh (b4_basic_symbol_constructor_define)
(_b4_token_constructor_declare, b4_token_constructor_declare)
Merge into...
(b4_basic_symbol_constructor_define, _b4_token_constructor_define)
(b4_token_constructor_define): these.
We used to define such auxiliary structures outside the class, mainly
as a matter of style to keep the definition of yy::parser short and
simple. However, now there's a lot more code generated inside the
class definition (e.g., all the token constructors), so the
readability no longer applies.
However, if we move stack (and slice) inside yy::parser, then it
should no longer be needed to change the namespace to have multiple
parsers: changing the class name should suffice.
One common argument against inner classes is that they code bloat. It
hardly applies here, since typically different parsers will have
different semantic value types, hence different actual stack types.
* data/skeletons/lalr1.cc: Invoke b4_stack_define inside yy::parser.
Suggested by Wolfgang Thaller.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bison/2018-12/msg00081.html
* data/c++.m4 (basic_symbol, by_type): Instead of provide either move
or copy constructor, always provide the copy one.
* tests/c++.at (C++ Variant-based Symbols Unit Tests): Check it.
Currently the following piece of code crashes (with parse.assert),
because we don't record that s was moved-from, and we invoke its dtor.
{
auto s = parser::make_INT (42);
auto s2 = std::move (s);
}
Reported by Wolfgang Thaller.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bison/2018-12/msg00077.html
* data/c++.m4 (by_type): Provide a move-ctor.
(basic_symbol): Be sure not to read a moved-from value.
* tests/c++.at (C++ Variant-based Symbols Unit Tests): Check this case.
Instead of introducing make_symbol (whose name, btw, somewhat
infringes on the user's "name space", if she defines a token named
"symbol"), let's make the construction of symbol_type safer, using
assertions.
For instance with:
%token ':' <std::string> ID <int> INT;
generate:
symbol_type (int token, const std::string&);
symbol_type (int token, const int&);
symbol_type (int token);
It does mean that now named token constructors (make_ID, make_INT,
etc.) go through a useless assert, but I think we can ignore this: I
assume any decent compiler will inline the symbol_type ctor inside the
make_TOKEN functions, which will show that the assert is trivially
verified, hence I expect no code will be emitted for it. And anyway,
that's an assert, NDEBUG controls it.
* data/c++.m4 (symbol_type): Turn into a subclass of
basic_symbol<by_type>.
Declare symbol constructors when variants are enabled.
* data/variant.hh (_b4_type_constructor_declare)
(_b4_type_constructor_define): Replace with...
(_b4_symbol_constructor_declare, _b4_symbol_constructor_def): these.
Generate symbol_type constructors.
* doc/bison.texi (Complete Symbols): Document.
* tests/types.at: Check.
On
%token <int> FOO BAR
we currently generate make_FOO(int) and make_BAR(int). However, in
order to factor their scanners, some users would also like to have
make_symbol(tok, int), where tok is FOO or BAR. To ensure type
safety, add assertions that do check that value type and token type
match. Bind this assertion to the parse.assert %define variable.
Suggested by Frank Heckenbach.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bison/2018-12/msg00034.html
Should also match expectations from Аскар Сафин.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bison/2018-12/msg00023.html
* data/variant.hh: Use b4_token_visible_if where applicable.
(_b4_type_constructor_declare, _b4_type_constructor_define): New.
Use them.
Bitten by macros, again.
See 680b715518.
* data/variant.hh (_b4_symbol_constructor_declare)
(_b4_symbol_constructor_define): Do not use user types, which can
include commas as in `std::pair<int, int>`, to macros.
* tests/local.at: Adjust the lex related macros to support the
case of token constructors.
* tests/types.at: Also check token constructors on types with commas.
I personally prefer 'non terminal', or 'non-terminal', but
'nonterminal' is the common spelling.
* data/glr.c, src/parse-gram.y, src/symtab.c, src/symtab.h,
* tests/input.at, doc/refcard.tex: here.
* data/README: Convert to Markdown.
Start documenting some of the macros used in all our skeletons.
Simplify and fix the documentation of the macros in the skeletons.
Currently it is the front end that passes the symbol types to the
backend. For instance:
%token <ival> NUM
%type <ival> exp1 exp2
exp1: NUM { $$ = $1; }
exp2: NUM { $<ival>$ = $<ival>1; }
In both cases, $$ and $1 are passed to the backend as having type
'ival' resulting in code like `val.ival`. This is troublesome in the
case of api.value.type=union, since in that the case the code this:
%define api.value.type union
%token <int> NUM
%type <int> exp1 exp2
exp1: NUM { $$ = $1; }
exp2: NUM { $<int>$ = $<int>1; }
because in this case, since the backend does not know the symbol being
processed, it is forced to generate casts in both cases: *(int*)(&val)`.
This is unfortunate in the first case (exp1) where there is no reason
at all to use a cast instead of `val.NUM` and `val.exp1`.
So instead delegate the computation of the actual value type to the
backend: pass $<ival>$ as `symbol-number, ival` and $$ as
`symbol-number, MULL`, instead of passing `ival` before.
* src/scan-code.l (handle_action_dollar): Find the symbol the action
is about, not just its tyye. Pass both symbol-number, and explicit
type tag ($<tag>n when there is one) to b4_lhs_value and b4_rhs_value.
* data/bison.m4 (b4_symbol_action): adjust to the new signature to
b4_dollar_pushdef.
* data/c-like.m4 (_b4_dollar_dollar, b4_dollar_pushdef): Accept the
symbol-number as new argument.
* data/c.m4 (b4_symbol_value): Accept the symbol-number as new
argument, and use it.
(b4_symbol_value_union): Accept the symbol-number as new
argument, and use it to prefer ready a union member rather than
casting the union.
* data/yacc.c (b4_lhs_value, b4_rhs_value): Accept the new
symbol-number argument.
Adjust uses of b4_dollar_pushdef.
* data/glr.c (b4_lhs_value, b4_rhs_value): Adjust.
* data/lalr1.cc (b4_symbol_value_template, b4_lhs_value): Adjust
to the new symbol-number argument.
* data/variant.hh (b4_symbol_value, b4_symbol_value_template): Accept
the new symbol-number argument.
* data/java.m4 (b4_symbol_value, b4_rhs_data): New.
(b4_rhs_value): Use them.
* data/lalr1.java: Adjust to b4_dollar_pushdef, and use b4_rhs_data.
* data/bison.m4, data/c++.m4, data/glr.c, data/java.m4, data/lalr1.cc,
* data/yacc.c, src/scan-code.l:
Fix comments.
Prefer POS to denote the position of a symbol in a rule, since NUM
is also used to denote symbol numbers.
Instead of defining yy::variant<S> and then alias
yy::parser::semantic_type to variant<sizeof (union_type)>, directly
define yy::parser::semantic_type.
This model is more appropriate if we want to sit the storage on top of
unions in C++11.
* data/variant.hh (b4_variant_define): Specialize and inline the
definition into...
(b4_value_type_declare): Here.
Define union_type here.
* data/lalr1.cc: Adjust.
Reported by Uxio Prego.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-bison/2018-11/msg00031.html
We also need to move the unreachable 'goto' to a reachable place,
otherwise clang complains about the code being unreachable anyway.
See also https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39736.
Interestingly, we don't have to apply that trick to
`#define YYCDEBUG if (false) std::cerr`, clang does not warn when the
code comes from macro expansion.
* configure.ac: Use -Wunreachable-code when supported.
* data/lalr1.cc, data/yacc.c: Pacify clang's warning about `if (0)`
by using a macro.
Another possibility was to move this statement to a reachable place.
* tests/actions.at, tests/c++.at: Avoid generating unreachable code.
We should probably introduce some struct and functions to deal with
stack management, rather than open coding it. yyparse would be much
nicer to read, and a better model for possible other skeletons.
* data/yacc.c (yyparse::yysetstate): Avoid generating code when
neither yyoverflow nor YYSTACK_RELOCATE is defined.
